This is AI. Oddly enough, I saw it earlier this week.
pressing X to doubt that you only help keep information on students that you’re required to by law.
If we were to store private information or data that falls outside the boundaries of the law, we would be subject to arrest for unlawfully retaining children’s data. I want to emphasize to both you and OP that schools are legally obligated to store this information, and that I strongly advise against tampering with a device owned by the school.
That’s not how it works.
uncritical support for surveillance
We are, by law, required to keep this information. However, unlike many other schools, we have a byod policy that allows students to use their own device to essentially bypass this ‘surveillance’.
I work for a school and I provision these types of devices. You do not want to modify or change anything about them, as it probably breaks your acceptable use policy. If they allow you to bring your own device, then do that. But do not change the device they give you in any manner. Just don’t use school property for things you want to be private. It works the exact same way with anything owned by any organization you may work for in the future. They own the device, they set the terms. And your excuse of ‘it does not break policy’ or ‘it is not against the law’ is ridiculous, as policy is intentionally broad for this reason, and the law requires you to not interrupt normal classroom activities. If the school lets you, bring your own device. Otherwise, tough luck, seems like you won’t be able to play your games.
Also note that they found that gender affirming care in this form (boob removal) has a lower risk of breast cancer- because there is less breast.
Flea markets?
“source?”
“…my gut is never wrong”
People, not censorship-prone dictatorships. There is a difference.
In other news, idiots exist everywhere. The interesting part will come when meta/threads responds to this.
The only major fuckup was the failure of student loan debt cancellation, and the pullout from Afghanistan. But arguably the latter wasn’t his fault, as it had been put in place before he was in office.
Depending on how you count a mass shooting, and if you count the person in denver who (allegedly) changed their identity to avoid hate crime charges.
They have duck.com too now, ironically google gave it to them for free.
It’s really interesting how some people wrongly claim that trans folks are more likely to commit mass shootings. The thing is, there aren’t many trans people out there, so if just one of them is involved in a shooting, it messes up the statistics. Basically, trans people aren’t going around shooting up places in any meaningful numbers, and anyone who says otherwise doesn’t understand statistical biases like insignificant number bias or sample selection bias work.
edit: Depending on how you count a mass shooting, and if you count the person in denver who (allegedly) changed their identity to avoid hate crime charges.
I never thought any republican ad would make me like trump even a little bit.
And the dude on the far right of the stage started to, but then quickly lowered it when he saw there would be no vote.