

Was this article written 15 years ago? Because this is anything but a new occurrence.
Was this article written 15 years ago? Because this is anything but a new occurrence.
I’m so glad that this 50-year-old joke is still funny.
Line must go up
Because it’s cheap.
Thanks for your service
Removed by mod
You’re the only one attempting to gaslight anyone here.
How typical for you to do something terrible and then blame someone else. This is exactly the sort of thing I’m talking about.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
There are dozens of us!
You were able to use your imagination to manufacturer something I never said. I suggest you engage your imagination once again to manufacturer an answer.
I didn’t mention “selfies” either
None. It seems particularly foolish and ripe for the worst kinds of abuse.
Whether you like being naked or not, or particularly care if others will see you naked, those images can be weaponized against you at any time. It’s best not to give a potential attacker ammunition.
I wish we lived in a better world, but we don’t.
Just remember how adorable this was when you wake up tomorrow and every shoe you own is filled with poo
They are clearly planning something
No
If an Onion article hurt your feelings: good.
You’ll get no sympathy from me.
Because of “conservatives”.
It has been my experience that, yes, the user experience of DuckDuckGo is far superior to that of Google, but, DuckDuckGo doesn’t always provide the precise results. I’m looking for. I can still get the information, but it takes a little bit more work.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m definitely not shilling for Google. Their search engine has definitely gone to shit in the last 5 to 8 years. But DuckDuckGo simply doesn’t have the incredible precision that Google can if it’s properly used.
I use both