

Unless you’re trying to tell me those things aren’t in the bill (they are), you haven’t said anything at all.
Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?
Unless you’re trying to tell me those things aren’t in the bill (they are), you haven’t said anything at all.
If you’re going to reply to me, you could at least make an effort to reference a single thing that I said.
How do the things in this bill accomplish that?
There’s no reason for us to come up with “draconian” bills to appease to Taco Chicken.
Maybe you should tell the Public Safety Minister.
Anandasangaree said Tuesday that Bill C-2 was drafted to contain “elements that will strengthen the relationship” between Canada and the U.S.
“There are a number of items in the bill that have been irritants for the U.S. so we are addressing some of those issues,” he said. “But it’s not exclusively about the United States.”
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-legislation-border-fentanyl-1.7550684
Of the points raised in the video, which do you think aren’t harmful?
Unilaterally cancelling immigration applications without any real oversight is draconian.
The video lays out a very concrete example of why the one-year limit on asylum claims is not a great idea.
I would think that eliminating “barriers” to forcing electronic service providers to hand over user data to law enforcement should be relevant to the interests of most Lemmy users.
Making it easier for the police to seize and open mail is…concerning.
”Pew, pew, pew, pew, pew.” The middle of the battle against the Rev-1 seems like an odd time for Murf to imitate someone complaining about “Star Trek: Discovery”, but he does seem to have things handled.
I couldn’t understand him because he was whispering, and I couldn’t see him because it was too dark, and also he was too woke. Is that a Bingo?
outside Canada they need to be better promoted as Canadian.
Interesting - what do you see as the benefit to that? I’m not disagreeing, but I hadn’t really considered it before.
One thing that needs to happen is the Conservative traitors to stop lying about and maligning the CBC.
Big yup.
The Nova Squadron cadets are practicing a maneuver called the Boothby Supernova, named for the venerable Starfleet Academy groundskeeper, who perished in such a maneuver, as per “In the Flesh”.
To shreds, you say.
I think something like that is happening - available rooms are being prioritized for evacuees with medical or accessibility needs, as the article says.
The issue with proactively evicting people is…those people have to go somewhere, too.
“I ask all levels of government, please come together, work together, ask that these hotels and these accommodations make space for our people. We are in a state of emergency, you can give that directive.”
I find this a little confusing - are they to “ask” the hotels to make space, or are they to “direct” them? Those are two very different things.
And if it’s the latter…is there a legal way to do so? This is an honest question, I have no idea what the answer is.
A decent chunk of his argument is simply to push back against this…loudly.
Finally, it is time to start calling out a lot of provincial grievance for the rank bullshit it often is.
Thanks - I find the “reformed” Senate fascinating.
Perhaps “urban” is the wrong word, but it ain’t exactly Cestus III, y’know?
As someone who’s not familiar with the LA area, it blows my mind that those things are basically in the middle of an urban area.
Thank you for sharing - we appreciate any and all first-person accounts of events!
I have to admit, when they first announced the Fan Fest Nights, my initial reaction was that it sounded like it would be kind of cheap and disappointing. But it seems like they did a really nice job of the Trek event, along with some of the others that I’ve read about (especially Back to the Future).
So is the protowarp merely a more powerful version of the warp drive?
That was my takeaway - it’s got the power to propel the ship (much) higher into the warp 9.9XXXXX range.
So you started with “there’s no reason to appease the US,” and have now landed on, “they say they’re trying to appease the US by giving them things they want, but they don’t really mean it”?
And that ignores all of the other things in this bill that are about immigration, and asylum seekers, and being able to sieze peoples’ mail, and forcing online providers to give up user data, all of which reach way beyond organized crime.