It seems like the judge disagrees, nice try though.

I mean the agency likely has a duty to ensure they’re received in a timely fashion though. The agency would likely have to step in to provide an alternative.

I mean this is kinda my point. As a matter of principal I don’t know how this is allowed.

I mean the say that I find it unjust. China can literally take over your whole operation for no reason if they want to. It doesn’t mean I will defend them for doing it, it just is what it is.

They aren’t even allowing pickups. That’s the crux of my disagreement here. Striking doesn’t mean you can just do anything with impunity.

There is such a thing as de-facto doing things though. It’d be more useful to look at precedent with similar cases than just a cold read of the words. It can very easily play out differently than you think.

I support unionization but come on this is pretty absurd. There’s no way this would fly here in the US. Imagine, not receiving mail from a federal service because the workers within it disagree with certain practices.

I’m about to use this supercharger tomorrow. Anyone want pictures of it or something?

It’s part of it for sure. It’s hard for enthusiasts to swallow but “it’s not that bad” for our patience levels is “screw this, I’m never using it again” for normal folk. In psychology people only need 2 bad experiences to lose trust in something all together and it’s important people realize that the “it just works” way of things is what is needed for mass adoption.