• 2 Posts
  • 127 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle

  • I’m not sure that would be the best solution. A cheater could still get caught cheating 6 times before requiring a repurchase, and it’s still a pretty harsh penalty for someone who didn’t cheat. You keep your game, but you can no longer share your library if your family situation changes.

    ‘Sorry, son, you can’t play my games on your computer because daddy made a bad decision when he was 21.’

    The ultimate solution is probably an online identity when playing any game. Imagine if cheating got you banned from all online games for 5 years.


  • Yeah, it’s most likely to prevent someone from using the family feature to get away with cheating.

    As it stands now, if you get caught cheating you must create a new account and repurchase the game. So the main deterrent is the full cost of a game.

    With the steam family function you could potentially create 5 new accounts per year, and simply remove them when they get caught cheating. The only deterrent would be the wait period.

    So I agree with their decision. The downside is that you must trust someone before adding them to your family. If your cheating son gets you kicked off counterstrike, then just remove him from your family. They’re never too old to drop off at the fire station.












  • My entry point into Star Wars was KotOR so I’ve always been pretty critical of the average Star Wars media. I really enjoyed Rogue One, Andor, Mandalorian S1&2, and Clone Wars S7. Star Wars can deliver sometimes.

    With a budget of $180M I was hopeful that Acolyte could be great, and it hasn’t delivered yet.



  • KaiReeve@lemmy.worldtoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Why does Communism require “true equality amongst its citizens?” What does that even mean, in practical terms?

    Do you imagine a communist system that has social classes?

    How would a group of people take advantage of this to form a “practical dictatorship?”

    Castro, Zedong, Putin

    Capitalism does not deploy the most efficient means of product delivery, but the most profitable…

    You’re arguing Communism on a philosophical level against capitalism on a practical level.

    What of Marx have you read? Or any leftist theorist?

    As I said, I’m not well read and unprepared for the higher level argument you are seeking here.

    I can make some suggestions for reading material if you wish.

    I appreciate your desire to educate, but I’m too busy being exploited by the current system to dive further into social philosophy. When you guys are ready to rise up I’ll be there, but I won’t be a part of the debate on which system we should implement going forward.


  • KaiReeve@lemmy.worldtoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    The recurring issue with Communism in practice is that it requires true equality amongst its citizens and there’s always some asshole or group of assholes who want power and dominion over others, so it seems to repeatedly fall into a practical dictatorship.

    Capitalism at its best requires businesses to find and deploy the most effective and efficient means of product delivery in order to compete with each other, which means that the consumer will always have the best product at the best price allowed by the market. The problem is that greedy assholes either conglomerate competing companies into monopolies, or otherwise collude with one another to maximize their profit margins.




  • But this is 200 years before the fall. We’re supposed to see how the Jedi lost their way. This is just a bunch of incompetent assholes with authority. The witches call them kidnappers and they barely deny it while nearly embodying it. Where’s the honor? Where’s the mysticism? Why must we continually suffer this bag of dicks while being told ‘this is what they were always supposed to be.’