• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 28th, 2023

help-circle

  • Statistically though it does technically reduce the mistakes, the issue is that they even still make them and in many of those cases they weren’t even on subjective ones.

    My personal hangup with VAR is around the rule that contact = foul and if they show a freeze frame or a slow mo, it removes the context altogether.

    I don’t think anything will ever stop people not liking decisions or consistency because there will always be subjective ones and people will always remember the bad ones especially against their own teams. But again that happened with general refereeing, people remember the hand of god, the Lampard goal against Germany and the Henry handball against Ireland. VAR would arguably have caught all those.




  • I think the concept of VAR actually never has been the real issue, the three issues are the officiating, the rules being so open to interpretation, and the players or teams constantly looking for fouls or begging for everything to get checked.

    It just leads to everything getting stopped and delayed for the smallest matters even though it was entirely meant to only iron out major issues. The officiating not getting the major issues correct then belatedly apologising isn’t a fault of the system and never has been. The system for the most part captures exactly what it is meant to, every mistake is some numpty doing their job wrong.






  • I’m Northern Irish and love seeing my national team, I think people find internationals boring because the draws are so skewed, making them almost not worth watching if your team is any good. Where we are seeded tends to get us drawn with one, if not two good teams per qualifying group.

    The main thing that bugs me about our international breaks is that the national teams’ games aren’t broadcast free like the England games. Ours are on Sky if we’re lucky, even the South have their on RTE.


  • I don’t think he should be fired for several reasons, we have already tried multiple high profile and even non high profile managers and this has been the theme. Why would another one change that? The most time they gave to any of them was arguably the least experienced manager. Who realistically do you think is available who is substantially better AND would take the role? The list wouldn’t be as great as people seem to think it would be.

    It is only the start of the second season, and we’ve been hit with crucial injuries and scandals. I won’t deny he has made some odd comments or subsistutions, but a lot of it is either in hindsight or it is clear there’s an internal issue at the club.

    Losing to City isn’t any kind of benchmark, they have been coached for years under Pep and I remember in the first season Pep was there, people were doubting him at that time. People are just insanely impatient, imagine Liverpool or City fired their managers based on a set of fans or pundits reactions. Hell, last season people were hyping EtH for what he did.

    The board issue doesn’t help either, it looks like the club will be further leached off of for the foreseeable future. The club really needed to be sold and the Glazers needed to be gone, no manager has freedom and every decision will be influenced by accountants and marketing guys.