Silva’s play today doesn’t indicate anything other than an off game. I thought Simon Hooper had a wildly different scale for what was deemed a foul/card, but Chelsea didn’t deserve a win regardless. Didn’t play their game at all.
Silva’s play today doesn’t indicate anything other than an off game. I thought Simon Hooper had a wildly different scale for what was deemed a foul/card, but Chelsea didn’t deserve a win regardless. Didn’t play their game at all.
I did this same thing last year for the Bournemouth game.
You have to get memberships for the both of you and then scour the ticket exchange for two tickets next to each other. It took me about a week, but it ended up working out.
When you get your memberships, you can link them together so one person can buy tickets for the two of you.
The good thing is if you buy your membership and don’t use it for literally anything, you can return it within two weeks. So say you don’t find any seats together, you can return it and it’s basically back to square one.
Andros Townsend against City
You’re right.
Because it’s the rules?
I think no one having a problem with the handball rule before VAR was hardly universally accepted.
Either way, intentional or not, there has to be an objective way to look at a situation. Unfortunately, Prem refs have screwed it up so much that the rules appear more subjective than they should. The widely accepted letter of the law is that Walker’s outstretched arm, one not in a natural position, handling the ball is a handball.
Reece had a handball and red card issued over a significantly closer “natural position” than Walkers with the same ref.
Walker’s handball should have been a handball. Anthony Taylor giveth and taketh away.
You got yourself a deal.