42firehawk

That is the “classic” approach, but dietician increasingly recommending varied strategies fire different people.

I’ve been trying to gain weight for years and the most effective method has been 2 meals a day and intentionally snacking on small candies throughout since those teens to make me feel hungry as an appetizer rather than full like other snacks did. If I needed to lose weight the recommended practice based on how I live would be 4 meals a day and never snacking.

The way gaining or losing weight works is simple, it’s calories in versus calories burned. For some people snacking, so long as it reduces how much is eaten at meals, increases calories burned by a significant amount. Therefore keeping them at a lower weight. For others it doesn’t have that effect, and usually it’s because those people eat a consistent amount in their meals regardless.

Usually p hacking doesn’t come from 1 constraint, especially a well explained one, but instead comes from adding a couple or completely unexplained constraints (like a team losing more if their coaches wife is in one section of the stands or another) because at that point it’s decreasing the number of samples (times you have as a reference) to force a significant result.

So usually for sports p hacking is stats about 1 team only, rather than a general stat about the sport. Preferably a restriction on the other team, then a follow up game based restriction so it seems plausible to the viewer.

To add to the other response - it is much more difficult to work with Ai to debug inconsistent issues or similar unless you can understand the code and step through with a debugger to check for race conditions or similar.

Recently I was working with an Ai tool for some c code that depending on machine ran wildly differently. The Ai was unable to identify any issues, and kept recommending fixes for hardcoding values or similar that I had to revert. The fix ended up needing to use valgrind to create a different enough environment to see how a race condition was made to properly have one async call delay for the other.

AI can be powerful, and humans can be dumb. But if the code was human made, I would not have needed 3 hours to find a problem, and I wouldn’t have tried to turn to AI for a simple fix because I’d know what I was looking for to start with.

But you’re forgetting the key difference that makes it so much worse - we can fix human mistakes especially if we can talk to the human to figure out how. With an llm we have no external reference, only poorly designed code where the comments are there to guide the writing, not describe what was written. So it’s much harder to debug an output, and the llm cannot be trusted to clean it up either.

Having worked food service, it means your restaurants didn’t get bad ingredients and such - I’ve had in receiving calls back and forth from the kitchen about what is 86 for now. Usually “salmon warm, 86 salmon” . Which would get a call back about what other stuff is supposed to be thrown out with it. “86 the peas they won’t make next shipment.”

Probably a fist.

Not necessarily, it’s a crime to deposit 9999 instead of 10 and not report. When I worked at a bank anyone who knew what they were doing and deposited 8-9k in cash got the form. People who found out and then did anything else? You get a form. People who walk out? They get a surprise notice from the fbi later.

Basically if the bank thinks you might be close we just give you the form and you don’t get to say no anymore.

I did a bit of a read, apparently the 2 most popular screen reading software sources (jaws and nvda) fully support the thorn character both isolated and in words correctly as of a 2024 review, but it was a major problem in 2022, prompting improvements in recognition.

Oddly, periods at the end of a post are currently considered a larger problem as depending on site syntax the reader has problems with if it should state the existence of a period or not. (something about if there is follow up or classifying it as isolated punctuation that holds unique meaning)

A chick? The person whose taken the most I know of is a dude. He just likes getting penetrated by pretty girls.

Pour a decent bit of algae into the water supply (freshwater shouldn’t have algae, but enough will get past standard biocides used in cooling)

Part of the reason I really like the minimum wage laws where I live (us but close to the border) is that the law says the minimum wage is based on a formula, and that formula is just a determination of what cost of living requires that wage to be. It’s simple, doesn’t allow for arguments over routine changes, and keeps it in an effective band.

There are issues with everything else, but at least that part is functional.

Having talked to some air traffic controllers with a better view of the situation - most of the changes aren’t short term dangers. It’s things that push towards worse safety reviews and prevention, lower coverage eventually, that type of safety takes at least a year to even take effect, and depending on he type of error, can take up to 40 years to finish clearing up (like changing hiring targets for at)

I mean, 3.6 million is a bit more money tbh.

I like trans is Thor better, gives those men some representation.

Yea for me the controller solves a lot of what I need from controllers and fits right at the price I don’t have to wait for, while the frame I buy when I am set for it since it’s the perfect upgrade for me for a long time. The machine is on my wishlist as a console idea if I ever want it. Each are wishlist, but have a very different priority.

So the only people who have say over the life of a child is the parents. Children have no personal rights against domestic abuse including neglect. In this specific example, neglecting their development.

The nation has a responsibility to make sure that neglect by the parents does not mean abuse to the child. That’s why the ultimate solution for neglect is foster care. In the same sense, the state can encourage involvement by parents, but can’t rely on it. Orphans exist, and more directly, abusive or neglectful parents exist.

And how do you get parents to universally improve over time? You can’t drive the improvement without a top down incentive at bare minimum. If no child left behind failed, look at why and try again, don’t give up and say the nation will be illiterate outside of the ruling class.

I mean they’re exclusively writing tools for power users for eventual implementation to mainline as they develop and test simplification that doesn’t alienate the power user… So managers can’t really say they’re doing anything bad or dumb ever because it’s power user features then porting.

I was a long distance runner, qualified to go to state finals even. I can never run safely in my life though, because I tore a tendon in a cross country race, and even though it’s been repaired surgically if I try again it will tear again.

There are only a few safe types of shoes I can wear to reduce injury risk, one of those being a Nike shoe. Walkers tolerated as a sign always stings.

I even remember in econ101 my professor brought up the basic analysis, then brought up a really cool example of this where the minimum wage changed in one state but not another in two towns right on the border. It was the perfect econ experiment to prove how supply and demand would cause inflation.

The next 5 years saw no change despite a 2 dollar an hour increase on one side only - the two towns maintained equal pricing, and no increase to inflation or pricing compared to the typical rate.

My favorite part was that he managed to be excited about it properly, because it was and is cool science to him when usually economics is trying to analyze how changes happened with way too many variables.