I know this is how people in the 80s and 90 imagined the future and a lot of concepts were probably too far fetched for them.

BUT… why arent they using drones to explore planets? why are there not more drone-spaceships? why does enterprise need a crew to begin with? Why is there so little automation? Why so few uses of AI in general?

I am saying this as a star trek the next generation person. I’d also expect them to have full video and sensory streams of any surface mission teams.

  • ApostleO@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    The in-universe answer re: drones would be that people want to explore. Sure, it’s dangerous, but it’s also exciting, fascinating, and fulfilling. That said, I feel like a responsible captain would make much more extensive use of probes than any of the shows.

    Re: data streams, I don’t have a good in-universe explanation. I have a similar question of why they don’t have security cameras in all the hallways and public areas.

    Also, using the transporter to go down to a planet always runs the risk of some storm or an orbital threat stranding your party. Why not use the shuttle as SOP? It gives your away team more resources, both for their mission and for an emergency.

      • Countess425@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was an episode of TNG where a “passenger” got onto ship’s comms and was contacting Picard on the bridge. When Picard told the guy that the comms were reserved for ship’s business, the guy asked why they weren’t restricted, if that was the case. Picard said that was unnecessary as people in Star Fleet generally just…behave themselves.

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That did change overtime though. They mentioned in Lower Decks that they beefed up security after the Pakleds attacks, which leads to Boimler not even being able to open doors (or activate emergency systems lol)

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a totally insane explanation, though. Lots of people are on the ship at all times who aren’t members of the crew, and that’s before you even consider things like hostile boarding parties.

          • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most of the civilians present on the Enterprise fall into one of three categories:

            • A non-Starfleet staff member, relative, or passenger, who would already know and respect etiquette regarding ship’s comms.

            • A non-hostile foreign diplomat, envoy, or similar passenger, who doesn’t want to potentially cause a diplomatic incident by being rude.

            I also recall lots of times where civilians used ship’s comms for various purposes, but it was to contact the person directly attending to them, or a friend/relative, not the ship’s captain. (It’s been years since my last rewatch though so I could be wrong here…)

            As for hostile parties, IIRC it’s implied that the computer locks them out automatically, and in emergencies the captain can lock down the entire ship, which is how Data hijacked the Enterprise when he went rogue, and why it was such a big deal.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a military / government ship. There is no real privacy.

        Everyone can read your personal logs if there’s a good enough reason. Anyone can just ask the computer where anyone is at any time. People can just barge into your holodeck program. Anyone, from civilians to bartenders can just call up the bridge and talk to the captain whenever they want. People are just expected to control themselves.

        I think of it like how people don’t need to carry defensive weapons now, while a knife was very common in the past. People are just expected to control themselves and not rob random strangers today.

  • Kyle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t remember who said this in the show in Universe; maybe Janeway? But I think a similar question was posed, and the answer was that nobody would have anything to do if exploration was entirely automated. It’s fun and exciting and gives people’s lives meaning.

    My headcanon is that many mundane things are automated, and we don’t see them because they aren’t plot-relevant.

  • experbia@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always said that Starfleet is, first and foremost, a jobs program.

    It gives purpose to people who can’t find their own, in a time where your needs are provided-for by default, and seeking personal fulfillment is the purpose for most people’s lives.

    Drones would cut out the human driving a shuttle over to inspect an anomaly or object themselves, robbing them of a sense of accomplishment and achievement. Starfleet is about that stuff, so that’s a no-go unless nobody wants to do it and it needs to be done anyway. We see that a lot, too. They do have probes and sensor stations and stuff, after all, usually in really boring and unfulfilling locations.

    They have excessive, ridiculous redundancy. They have people doing jobs the ship computers could (and often, in times of need, DOES) perform very well on its own. There are several recorded instances of entire starships being successfully maintained for extended periods of time by a single individual (who does go insane due to isolation every time, because plot).

    • ApostleO@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      See also: any time an AI has been given command of a vessel (except Data, and even then he caused problems a couple times).

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “That was the stun setting. This is not. I can reduce this pumping station to a pile of debris.”

        —Data, the most sophisticated android in the federation, conducting diplomacy

    • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please explain, this is a starfleet drone attacking a starfleet ship? Was the drone highjacked or just went rogue on it’s own?

    • milkisklim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And more importantly, the drone MISSED data that revealed the planet was inhabited!

      Not Star Trek, but the Three Laws of Robotics is the textbook on why AI and any strict programmatic interpretation of Rules is a flawed goal.

  • arquebus_x@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one’s going to watch a realistic exploration sci-fi show about small unmanned ships quietly going about their jobs with no drama.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    They tried to, but the exocomms became sentient and they couldn’t be used as slave labour anymore.

    • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean i just watch a the next gen episode where some science guy had created a rift in spacetime and instead of sending in a drone/probe they almost got Lieutenant Data killed. Another thing I was wondering why aren’t they backing up Lieutenant Data?

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Having also recently seen that episode, they send Data in because he’s the only one who wasn’t confused by the time weirdness. Picard even tells him sending others would only slow Data down and if they should get hurt it would make the time sensitive mission even more difficult.

        As for why they don’t have more Datas: They don’t even know how he works. The dude who made him and Lore died without sharing his research.

        • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh I didn’t get that far, I do remember Data’s whole exploring his roots/dad episode from back in the 90s when I watched at the time. But haven’t gotten that far in rewatches yet. That would explain why they can’t back him up to hdd. They probably wouldn’t get all the permissions for all the folders right so a restore from backup would probably not work.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Actually… That kind of backup may be possible… 🤔

            I mean, if they can accidentally backup real humans (second Riker, Scotty in the transport buffer, Broccoli turning himself into a super computer, etc), surely they could purposely backup the android. lol

            • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The one time they purposely “backed up” a human via the transporter it took up so much space they had to dump the backup into the holosuite and it still nearly brought the entire station’s computer to its knees.

      • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One thing to remember, is that the concept of drones and AI, how we are currently developing and improving those, was not something people back then had on the radar.

  • Phillip J Phry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a similar vein, I’ve been rewatching TNG and find myself thinking that they really should have put a cctv camera in engineering. Could have saved them a lot of trouble.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They aren’t?

    Enterprise sends out probes (drones) just about every other episode, especially in TNG. Almost everything is automated on the ship, controlled through the computer interface.

    • Waltzy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, given the current trajectory of software and hardware, they probably could.

  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the original series episode I just watched, they reference that they’ve sent out tons of unmanned drones/probes to map out systems and planets, but starships are enormous and better equipped, so they follow up on any readings from the probes that seem interesting. If there’s an in-universe answer that isn’t “it makes better television”, I’d say it’s a combination of:

    1. Space is really, really big, so probes are only covering small areas anyway.

    2. Their mission is to explore and contact new life, which is more likely to be successful with a human touch.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Space is really, really big, so probes are only covering small areas anyway.

      That’s backwards. Probes can always cover a vastly larger area than manned ships, so needing to cover more area is always a reason to invest in more probes rather than dumping resources into a handful of very expensive ships.

    • arquebus_x@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their mission is to explore and contact new life, which is more likely to be successful with a human touch.

      Have you met us? ;)

    • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, a lot of the niches served by drones are already covered by AI driven holograms. If you’re not worried about bulky hardware and can supply holo-emitters on the cheap via replicators why wouldn’t you?

    • RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      which is more likely to be successful with a human touch.

      Andorians and Tellarites: “Are we a fucking joke to you!?”

      Vulcans: “We must expend great effort to suppress our feelings of amusement at all of you.”

      *Federation civil war begins