• mattscott53@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds about right. I could see Chelsea easily paying that. Or even United could jump in off Onana continues to underwhelm

      • NiallMitch10@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If United come in - we should be absolutely trying to rinse them. That said - I can’t see any other team going in for him that we can expect a huge fee off.

        Ideally it should be like 40m+ based on what we paid for him, his international status, age and ability. But I’d be surprised if we break even on the 30m we spent

      • pewpew62@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He signed a new contract last summer. Onana cost 50m. We should make them both pay 50m minimum for a homegrown keeper. It should actually be more but we don’t have the cache/reputation needed to ask for exorbitant prices

    • Oy778@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering our record about selling in recent times? Not that much