X (Twitter) to soon begin charging $1 annual subscription in order to tweet and interact.

Next move must be to charge users deleting their accounts $1. And Elon can sell your data to make more money.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m gonna call it. This is an (obvious) attempt to squeak in monetization for everyone on twitter that is as unobjectionable as possible, and once everyone’s locked in the price will increase, and tiers will be introduced, etc etc., and it’s going to work. Nobody still on twitter is gonna care about $1/year to keep access. They’ll lap it up and thank Musk for the opportunity to be fleeced.

    Musk could still fuck it up by being overly greedy and ramping up too much too fast like he tried to do last year (or this year? I’ve lost track), but I’d say this has reasonable odds of working out.

    • danielton
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      Elon simps are already going “lol $1 i literally paid more than that for my coffee”

      • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        and then the capitalism admirers: “I don’t have problem to pay for a good service. What do you people think? Isn’t it costly to run a good service?”

        • danielton
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah except that the spammers already have blue checkmarks. They’re already paying.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        $1 a year for a service you enjoy and use is fine, especially if it leads to a decrease in bots and trolls.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It will absolutely decrease bots. What credit cards are they going to pay with? 1 card per bot? Where are the bot farms getting all these credit cards?

            • danielton
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh you have no idea how easy it is to create extra credit card numbers or buy gift cards. Regular people do this all the time to prevent giving websites their real credit card info. Regular people aren’t going to start paying for a social media site that was free for 17 years. They’ll move elsewhere or quit using it.

              As it is now, most spammers I’ve run across on Twitter have blue checkmarks. They’re already paying.

              • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s a barrier to entry and it has been proven to work.

                I’ve not seen any spammers and bots with blue ticks.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      for everyone on twitter that is as unobjectionable as possible, and once everyone’s locked in the price will increase, and tiers will be introduced, etc etc., and it’s going to work.

      I’m not so sure about that. The internet is littered with companies that gave away their product for free hoping users would pay for premium features. When they didn’t and the companies then had to charge a minimum entry fee for everyone, people dropped the product. There’s a barrier to putting in your credit card. Lots of people just aren’t interested.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are also a whole lot of governmental, health and official bodies where putting through an invoice is a real pain in the bum. It forces a decision whereas previously if had been a simple business as usual process

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re definitely right about that being the general result to these sorts of moves, but I don’t think it’ll apply as harshly to this situation. Like I said, anyone still on the site has already faced numerous insults and abuse at the hands of Musk. They want to be there despite all of that, or maybe even because of it. I do think a $1/month or something higher would be pretty likely to fail, but $1/year is such a low-level ask and will gently push the users there past the barrier to where the price can be raised higher later.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          $1/year is such a low-level ask and will gently push the users there past the barrier to where the price can be raised higher later.

          The amount being asked isn’t the barrier I’m referring to. Twitter could be charging one penny, and they’d still lose this particular group. Consumers have been burned by entering a credit card for a low or free trial only later to discover sudden fees they couldn’t get refunded. The only protection is to not give your credit card.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not really. I was working with the communications department of a large local authority in London recently. They use Twitter/X as a broadcast medium for public snnouncements via Hootsuite. I don’t think they had noticed any disruption at all. Similarly with Public Health and the NHS

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Musk wants Twitter to become a ‘platform for everything’. Having a payment system in place everyone uses already is key for that.

      Not going to say that this is a good idea, but thats the rational.