User data stolen from genetic testing giant 23andMe is now for sale on the dark web::User data from 23andMe accounts has been leaked and put up for sale on a dark web forum after what appeared to be a “credential stuffing” cyberattack.

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing 23andme could have done to prevent this is 2fa.

    Not true. It’s easy to detect hundreds of thousands of logins from VPN locations. Or parse that someone is logging in from thousands of miles away from their profile location and send an email. There’s many simple things to implement that they could have done to protect your account with them. They took the easy route.

    While the User does bare most of the blame, claiming that 23andme couldn’t do anything else is strictly wrong.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Preventing these kinds of attacks is a nontrivial problem space and is the exact reason why scraping services are a lucrative business.

      It is not trivial to prevent dark web actors from using botnets to make requests and it is comparatively inexpensive to access botnets as a service.

      Sending emails for suspicious login is 2fa, by the way.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is not trivial

        And yet I just explained to you two ways to do it real easily that I’ve implemented into several platforms. It has been trivial.

        Sending emails for suspicious login is 2fa, by the way.

        Only if you actually block login until link is clicked in email. Just sending an email is not 2fa. You don’t need to specifically block the user, a notification would be sufficient for many users to understand “Wait… I didn’t login, I should change my password immediately.”

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you think that IP blocking stops credential stuffing you really are out of your depth.

          Would it stop this guy if he was some skid just running Kali? Absolutely.

          But it ain’t going to stop anyone more determined. Especially since you’re going to let those blocks expire to avoid blocking legitimate customers. A patient opposition with minimal resources will get by that kind of naive approach.

          Not only that but you have 0 evidence they didn’t IP block. They absolutely could have standard protocols in place but anything short of 2fa is inherently vulnerable.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you want to move goalposts… Then fine. But I won’t engage in that bullshit.

            It IS trivial to implement. It is literally a non-zero thing they could have implemented but chose not to. That’s all I’ve claimed.

            Go strawman someone else.

            If you think that IP blocking stops credential stuffing you really are out of your depth.

            You can slow it way the fuck down though if you do it right. But nah, I’m out of my depth supposedly. You sound like a fucking tool.

            • akrot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think what he was trying to say, implementing those strategies would deter 90% of rookies (using kali toolkit as a service), but not the 10% who got the right technical knowledge and enough motivation to clamp down on what they want.