hardypart@feddit.de to pics@lemmy.world · 3 年前The 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square323linkfedilinkarrow-up11.84Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.81Karrow-down1external-linkThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comhardypart@feddit.de to pics@lemmy.world · 3 年前message-square323linkfedilink
minus-squaremagnolia_mayhem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down1·3 年前There are productions that still use film? EDIT: Missed the iMAX part.
minus-squarePhotographer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·3 年前Many. And this isn’t even the footage, this is the print for the cinema.
minus-squareZpiritual@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·edit-23 年前A surprising number of films are still shot on film and then transfered to a digital intermediate for editing and later distribution. Not only the few film imax ones. I wonder if anyone is still doing their editing on film, I highly doubt it.
minus-squareatempuser23@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 年前deleted by creator
minus-squareZpiritual@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 年前I never thought of that as a possibility. Best of both worlds then I guess.
minus-squaremagnolia_mayhem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 年前Or worst. I don’t know enough about editing to say.
There are productions that still use film?
EDIT: Missed the iMAX part.
Many. And this isn’t even the footage, this is the print for the cinema.
A surprising number of films are still shot on film and then transfered to a digital intermediate for editing and later distribution. Not only the few film imax ones. I wonder if anyone is still doing their editing on film, I highly doubt it.
deleted by creator
I never thought of that as a possibility. Best of both worlds then I guess.
Or worst. I don’t know enough about editing to say.