cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news@lemmy.world/t/488620

65% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tbf I guess it makes a bit of sense, if say LA, NYC, CHI, and DC all vote to ban cars because they feasibly can and they have the population density to make it happen, some guy in Nebraska who’s nearest neighbor is 15mi away might be upset that he has to get a horse and buggy to buy cold cuts at the costco. On the one hand, fuck him, he should abandon his farm, life, and friends and move to the city (to starve with the rest of us I guess, if all the farmers move), but on the other they probably don’t want to do that which is why they live where they do now.

    • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      if say LA, NYC, CHI, and DC all vote to ban cars because they feasibly can and they have the population density to make it happen

      Nobody is trying to do that. That’s just a boogeyman the media is telling you to get you riled up.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not the question, the question was “why does state matter at all?” State could matter because different states are different, America big n’ such.

        • PizzaMan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And moving to STAR/approval voting would directly reflect each state far better than the electoral college ever could.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not “being fair” that’s “being unaware that the presidential election is only for selecting a president”

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Presidents that seem to like executive decrees these days*

        Idk man, not saying it’s likely they’d do that, just saying “having a few cities be largely responsible for selecting the head of the executive branch may not be desireable to those living in between.”

        Figured people would be able to not take everything literal, but this is the internet where metaphor is replaced with dunking on someone you decide is mentally inferior, my mistake.