• x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Being a prompter is the most replaceable job. If all of these jobs are going away, prompter is the most certain one.

    We have bots that can mimic human text. You are feeding all the text from your job into an AI company. They have exclusive access to that prompt data. If there is any data they like training on more than free data, it’s exclusive data. They can use it to claim they have an edge over people who only have access to open data. That gets them investment. So they 100% will train on it even independent of how well it will improve the product, which it will do that too.

    Prompt engineering will not be a job in two years. Will non-prompting jobs disappear? Sure. With 80% certainty. But the lost of prompting jobs is 100% certain.

    Prompting is the future of work, for about one or two more years.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I kinda get what you’re saying and I honestly thought the same a couple of years ago. But like…CEOs and even low level managers are not going to run this shit and deliver anything. It’s way, way too much like actual work.

      It does, however, expose what the pain points of software development actually are: communication, understanding, requirements being unclear, etc etc etc forever.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    12 hours? What country has programmers working 12 hours a day? 8h max, bro. That’s my hard limit.

  • Gyrcas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can confirm as someone who’s a programmer, I liked my job before AI, but it sucked all the fun from it :(

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Alright, hey, it was just a question. Maybe it was a possibility. 🤷‍♂️💆‍♂️

          Does your employer monitor your use of AI? Maybe you can just spend tokens on bullshit and keep working normally/manually on the side?

          • x0x7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The productivity of AI is high. Depending on the task at hand, let’s say it’s UI, he’s not going to produce the volume AI will.

            I’m not saying using AI is smart long term. It will brain rot you completely, and you will lose meaningful skills. But these companies don’t care about developers’ maintaining continued learning or even retained learning. They just want to extract volume. But once they spit you out you’ll have no independent skills. And saying you can prompt bots good at a job interview won’t be enough because everyone can do that. Using AI is a kind of mental hazard, and no one is getting hazard pay. Unless the job is paying enough to retire in 5 years it isn’t enough. Continued development is a critical part of having sufficient compensation. And these prompt jobs don’t offer that. So people should quit them.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I would definitely not take a job that forces me to use AI. I’d rather find another line of work.

              • Fluke@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Consider for a moment that other people may not be in a position to simply “find another line of work”. Perhaps they have dependants, or medical issues, or any number of other situations that could prevent them from being able to retrain into another profession, or even to be able to switch employers.

                You’re in a very privileged position if finding another line of work is something actually sensibly achievable.

                • Victor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Consider for a moment that other people

                  Yup, no problem — I already was only speaking for myself when I was using “I” as the pronoun. 👍

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I thi that any claims about LLM’s capabilities de serve heavy skepticism.

    Because of the amount of misinformation and outright propaganda that is being pumped out.

    This does not mean the algorithms are incapable of anything - just that you can’t trust anything without cross-checking.

    The thing is we are sitting in the no mans land of an information warfare zone. People have been killed for less money than what is at stakes for the “AI” companies.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yep. You’re a meat proxy now.

    The same thing is starting to happen at my company: the engineers ask AI to do their jobs, and simply forward requests from other engineers who also ask AI to do the job. It’s utterly absurd to watch.

    Soul-sucking indeed…

  • Aeder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    What actually makes it soul sucking is if you still have a sense of duty or responsibility to deliver high quality code, because you will be knee deep in slop code without enough time to review it, or if you’re forced to review it. If you stop giving a shit, you can use that time to find another job or do research for your own project.

  • underscores@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure if I believe any story on AI that is not experienced by me or someone I know and trust

    Anything that is posted online is part psyop imo

    I specifically do not trust X users

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have heard about this complaint already, so I’m not surprised, but i don’t disagree with your stance. It’s a game of distorting mirrors

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some people will do it for fear of losing their job.

      As though it’s easy to just find other people willing to work twelve hour days.

      If you’re filling that extremely hard to find role for them, you’re the problem. You’re hurting yourself, and you’re hurting the rest of us.

      In a high skill job if you’re putting in a really solid 4-5 hours and spending the other 3-4 hours doing easy/coasting work, you’ve officially worked a full day and should stop both for yourself and the rest of humanity.

      Don’t volunteer yourself to be a slave to your job. Many many places will pressure you into doing the work of 1.5-3 people in the name of efficiency, sometimes without even realizing that’s what they’re doing.

      Don’t enable them.

      If they don’t have enough people for the work, that’s their problem and not yours. You should report it as such.