On the surface that may sound good, and obvious, but does it feel strange for anyone else?
Flip the countries around a bit “spy chief of France made trip to India to warn against attack…”
Why is there a head of a spy agency, going to talk directly to another foreign government period, let along in person. What happened to making a call and/or ambassadors (oh wait, didn’t the US nuke most of them)
See, the strangeness comes from the expectation that the players involved and their institutions, are separate entities which are beholden to operating with the best interests of their respective sovereign government structures.
Were this so, ambassadors to make those phone calls would have still been around and the method used in this part of the geopolitical dance choreography.
They aren’t separate entities, regardless of what the charters, laws, and mission statements say.
It is not the US and the Russian Federation’s interests that this meeting was for.
An oligarch is an Oligarch first, and a member of their natal nation-state second. I hope I don’t need to spend a whole lot of time going over the US side of the transnational Oligarchy.
But the head of the spy agency wouldn’t be discussing the effects of an attack with a foreign nation, but he would be a good messenger to send for an interdepartmental memo going over the long term strategy and the quarterly reports, from the Operations department over to the Finance department.
Bullshit. Election fuckery and how to screw Ukraine.
a.k.a. The Usual.
A better deterrent would be USA not attacking NATO
He went there to ask for directions away from there.
😉
