DISCLAIMER: lurking not actively doing shit like posting or retweeting, and uBlock Origin is active, meaning Musk does NOT get any cent. That as much as I would love to dox that little shit, there are fora and platforms prohibiting against such actions, including this one (see Section 2 of ToS).

      • TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works
        432·
        27 days ago

        There is no good reason to use Twitter, and there hasn’t been for years. Any reason to stay is overshadowed by the fact that by using it you’re helping a fascist billionaire chud destabilize governments around the world and indirectly murder thousands or millions of poor people.

  • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
    153·
    27 days ago

    Not that this shouldn’t happen,but to prevent this again I would start by not uploading it to twitter. Or in general the internet. Again not justifying the EULA or the user base, its just the only direct thing I think you can do.

    Even if no one told grok to do this, grok is still absorbing everything you upload on to that.

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      9·
      27 days ago

      Well, Green drew it. Red claims Green has no ownership and can’t tell Red what they can and can’t do with the drawing Green made of a character that is neither Red’s nor Green’s. Why Red thinks that, I don’t know.

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        3·
        27 days ago

        Ok so “the character isn’t Green’s” but they still drew it?

        That is what was confusing.

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          6·
          26 days ago

          I imagine it will be some fanart. In a legal sense, that character would probably be the intellectual property of whoever owns the work. In an artistic sense, Green invested the time and effort to create this specific artwork.

          The general vibe in fanart communities I’ve been in is that you’re allowed to take bits from other people’s work and make something new with them, so long as you also invest the time and effort to actually make something artistic yourself and give credit. It’s also considered good manners to ask the artist for permission, as a gesture of acknowledgement and respect for the work they put in.

          Red contributed nothing, asked nothing, just shoved it into an AI to slop up some animated version. On top of the general disdain that actual artists tend to have for AI-generated content, that’s just plainly disrespectful.

          In that framing, Red is correct that Green doesn’t own the character, but wrong to assert that Green also doesn’t own the artwork. How that would shake out in a legal sense, I don’t know, but it’s a dick move either way.