“White Female Mamdani”?

Seattle mayor Katie Wilson added a BUS LANE.

Daily Mail is pure garbage.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      261
      ·
      4 days ago

      In one line I got:

      • She’s comparable to current rockstar mayor

      • She fixed bus service

      • She hersekf uses bus service

      • She noticed a problem and fixed it

      • bright@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        118
        ·
        4 days ago
        • She likely could afford a car since she has a mayor’s salary, but wisely chooses to ride the bus because of its many benefits to society
      • rainwall@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        To give more history about this route, there is a annual "race the 8! event scheduled by seattle urbanists where people start off on the worst part of its route and do increasingly outlandish activities on foot while still beating it to its designations. Folks have beat it juggling, walking backwards, dancing, etc. Katie and her kids participated before she was the mayor, and you guessed it, beat it.

        This route serves an intensely dense part of the city and has been failing people for years. The city/county have been making piddly, empty changes for nearly a decade that fixed nothing, like adding a 1 block bus lane. Yup, one block only.

        The bus is regularly 30-40 minutes late, which makes using it miserable and unreliable. The reason its route is terrible is that there is a highway onramp thats right there near Amazon HQ. So for years and years people commuting in and out of the city have been prioritized over people who live in it, and no previous mayor had the stones to push back and fix it for actual residents.

        • Jiral@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 days ago

          It is not just prioritising car commuters from outside vs locals, it is simply an extremely wasteful use of limited traffic capacity. The bus, not clogged down in traffic, has a way higher capacity than probably even two full car lanes at the highest performance. A bus lane is the only rational thing there. If that makes the highway off ramp redundant because there is no capacity for cars left to justify it, simply tear it down. It is fake capacity anyway if the traffic cannot be supported further down the road and it would even benefit car drivers, as it would remove a clogging point and free up capacity on the highway.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I agree with everything you say until the end. It’s disingenuous to say that residents do not take the highway. It runs through the middle of the city! We all take the damn highway.

          • rainwall@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ehh, way more residents take or would take that bus then would use that on ramp. Its mainly an ingress point to the freeway for people who commute.

            The ramp isnt even closing, its just being sanely re-routed to not cause such a clusterfuck.

            • Drusas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              That particular on-ramp, yes. I’d rather just drive south (I live to the south) a little bit and take an easier one. But still, anyone who drives here uses I-5 all the time.

              That ramp really does need to be rerouted. It makes that entire area undrivable.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      4 days ago

      Right? Like the worst thing they could say is that she… Fixed the public bus system so it actually functions on time instead of being inconsistent? Like, I don’t get how these people think that’s such a bad thing.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        4 days ago

        Cause they had an extra lane for their private vehicle and they feel like a service their taxes paid for has been robbed from them to serve people “that haven’t worked hard enough for it.” They worked hard to buy and pay for their car and they feel upset if their ability to use their private vehicle on public infrastructure has been diminished. Despite the fact that cars have been given the vast majority of space and funding for decades. There is also nothing stopping them from using the improved bus service except their preconception that “its for the poors.”