Must be nice being so ignorant of economic and class based interests and being that oblivious to the systemic forces of our society and how they manifest.
It doesn’t have to exist yet to readily assume, using class based analysis of our society, that it will be used against us by those who control the means to its distribution and implementation.
How does a breathalyzer interlock violate your privacy.
No part of this regulation, which again doesn’t even exist, requires any data to leave the vehicle.
And even if it did, the options here are not ‘vehicle that respects your privacy’ and ‘vehicle that spies on you to see if you’re drunk driving’. The options on the table are ‘vehicle that tracks your location and provides it to corporations and the government’ and ‘vehicle that does that while also checking your BAC’
Must be nice being so ignorant of economic and class based interests and being that oblivious to the systemic forces of our society and how they manifest.
It doesn’t have to exist yet to readily assume, using class based analysis of our society, that it will be used against us by those who control the means to its distribution and implementation.
Removed by mod
Prove me youre not a bot
Good news, the person who acted like a bot deleted their account!
Removed by mod
You failed.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group.
That’s ironic from you, this entire thread is you getting mad that people don’t want privacy invasions.
How does a breathalyzer interlock violate your privacy.
No part of this regulation, which again doesn’t even exist, requires any data to leave the vehicle. And even if it did, the options here are not ‘vehicle that respects your privacy’ and ‘vehicle that spies on you to see if you’re drunk driving’. The options on the table are ‘vehicle that tracks your location and provides it to corporations and the government’ and ‘vehicle that does that while also checking your BAC’