Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell “won’t someone think of the children” while taking the most oppressive position.
How does a breathalyzer interlock violate your privacy.
No part of this regulation, which again doesn’t even exist, requires any data to leave the vehicle.
And even if it did, the options here are not ‘vehicle that respects your privacy’ and ‘vehicle that spies on you to see if you’re drunk driving’. The options on the table are ‘vehicle that tracks your location and provides it to corporations and the government’ and ‘vehicle that does that while also checking your BAC’
Removed by mod
You failed.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Eh, that seems like falling into the two party fallacy. Plenty of silly in every sub group.
Fair, I just find the people who want more surveillance because of a vague “protecting the community” to be stupid.
Oh yes a very silly position to hold over all. But lets not pretend its a unique viewpoint only held by one sub group or another. Way too many people yell “won’t someone think of the children” while taking the most oppressive position.
Fair, Tipper Gore comes to mind.
That’s ironic from you, this entire thread is you getting mad that people don’t want privacy invasions.
How does a breathalyzer interlock violate your privacy.
No part of this regulation, which again doesn’t even exist, requires any data to leave the vehicle. And even if it did, the options here are not ‘vehicle that respects your privacy’ and ‘vehicle that spies on you to see if you’re drunk driving’. The options on the table are ‘vehicle that tracks your location and provides it to corporations and the government’ and ‘vehicle that does that while also checking your BAC’