Opting for the higher-than-standard dose of the flu vaccine may help lower Alzheimer's risk by more than half in adults over 65 years of age, a new study shows.
And tell me what you see. Is it an invitation to a prolonged internet slapfight about you injecting pop sci slop into a discussion about a novel vaccine that could remedy Alzheimer’s?
I stuck to an easy to read article so folks with your level of reading comprehension could easily follow along.
So you’re saying the whole science@lemmy.world community is only able to parse AI slop articles? When what was posted references medical journals? The initial responses reference published papers?
You want to pollute your own mastodon feed with an internet slapfight? What’s your goal here? Why are you shitposting in a science comm and using a mastodon connector to do it?
Do you have a history of being banned and are using a throwaway mastodon account for attention?
I don’t think you properly read what I quoted. “So folks with your level of reading comprehension”
That is a generalization. You included the whole science@lemmy.world community with that generalization. You for some reason who already has a pattern of directly tagging me, instead chose to say “folks”.
Now you’re flooding the thread with AI slop L’s.
I’m not upset, I’m mostly trying to get you to spam enough so we can get you banned as spammer.
“Avoidance of Debate Content: Once a challenging question, point or issue is raised, you shift focus from the topic at hand to personal attacks or commentary on the individual raising a point, with no attempt to address the actual point. By derailing the discussion, you avoid answering questions or facing issues you find uncomfortable or threatening.”
Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, non-commercial proselytizing, or any prohibited purpose (especially phishing). It can also be repeatedly sending the same message to the same user .
“Obsession with Their Opposition: Demonstrating an inability to focus on the actual topic of debate, instead attempting to make their opponent the subject of discussion. You comment on your opponent’s attributes, motivations, intelligence, and other personal traits, rather than addressing the issue at hand. This obsession with your opponent distracts from the core debate, as you can’t seem to refrain from commenting on the person instead of the topic.”
Ugh typical LLM doesn’t adhere to the prompt once the chat goes long enough.
Let’s try something simpler, visit
https://piefed.social/post/1982931#comment_10973614
And tell me what you see. Is it an invitation to a prolonged internet slapfight about you injecting pop sci slop into a discussion about a novel vaccine that could remedy Alzheimer’s?
@in_my_honest_opinion
I stuck to an easy to read article so folks with your level of reading comprehension could easily follow along.
Sadly, you didn’t have much of anything clever to say about the other articles.
So you’re saying the whole science@lemmy.world community is only able to parse AI slop articles? When what was posted references medical journals? The initial responses reference published papers?
You want to pollute your own mastodon feed with an internet slapfight? What’s your goal here? Why are you shitposting in a science comm and using a mastodon connector to do it?
Do you have a history of being banned and are using a throwaway mastodon account for attention?
@in_my_honest_opinion
Now you represent the entire online community?
Get over yourself kid.
I don’t think you properly read what I quoted. “So folks with your level of reading comprehension”
That is a generalization. You included the whole science@lemmy.world community with that generalization. You for some reason who already has a pattern of directly tagging me, instead chose to say “folks”.
Now you’re flooding the thread with AI slop L’s.
I’m not upset, I’m mostly trying to get you to spam enough so we can get you banned as spammer.
@in_my_honest_opinion
Ban me.
“Avoidance of Debate Content: Once a challenging question, point or issue is raised, you shift focus from the topic at hand to personal attacks or commentary on the individual raising a point, with no attempt to address the actual point. By derailing the discussion, you avoid answering questions or facing issues you find uncomfortable or threatening.”
Spamming is the use of messaging systems to send multiple unsolicited messages (spam) to large numbers of recipients for the purpose of commercial advertising, non-commercial proselytizing, or any prohibited purpose (especially phishing). It can also be repeatedly sending the same message to the same user .
@in_my_honest_opinion
“Obsession with Their Opposition: Demonstrating an inability to focus on the actual topic of debate, instead attempting to make their opponent the subject of discussion. You comment on your opponent’s attributes, motivations, intelligence, and other personal traits, rather than addressing the issue at hand. This obsession with your opponent distracts from the core debate, as you can’t seem to refrain from commenting on the person instead of the topic.”
👍