Likewise this is the same government hell bent on Israel slaughtering in the Middle East so they can have their rapture or whatever. There is no doubt this is related to white supremacism/Christian nationalism.
I agree, though I am of the opinion that in secular states (at least at home and in peace time) government officials (including the army) should not wear any religious iconography
Yes I see that problem and in the best case it would not be renouncing their beliefs not to wear something where it is not appropriate, but there are many other beliefs or reasons where one is excluded from official office/army, etc.
Similar to the original meaning of this post.
Many countries forbid people to enter the military and similar office, if they are known to hold extreme believes (e.g. extreme right wing rhetoric has been used by them or such). Not always foolproof though
I think you are correct as it is now. And I do agree, as it is right now it is not practical to be completely secular for people holding these offices.
However, ideally, these groups would not need the recognition in this way as they ought to already have it otherwise and understanding that at some places some things are limited, should not discourage them to believe in what they want.
First, fuck the ADL. They are so pro-fascism their own logo is now a hate-symbol.
Second, the Jerusalem cross on dozens of buildings doesn’t sounds like a very significant Christian symbol. It’s very contextual.
Third, you clearly haven’t looked very hard.
Fourth, your conclusion is… really stupid. Stop being such a snowflake.
deleted by creator
The ADL is a ZioNazi hate org, no upstanding member of society should ever care what they say.
https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2025/01/22/adl-defends-nazi-salutes/
Likewise this is the same government hell bent on Israel slaughtering in the Middle East so they can have their rapture or whatever. There is no doubt this is related to white supremacism/Christian nationalism.
deleted by creator
Fuck Christians and their symbology.
deleted by creator
I appreciate you.
I agree, though I am of the opinion that in secular states (at least at home and in peace time) government officials (including the army) should not wear any religious iconography
deleted by creator
I would say ideally not as they represent the state and thus should not wear iconography of any sort for secular states.
I also know that this might not be exactly practial in reality
for a lot of people that is asking them to renounce their religious beliefs in service of the national interest
Yes I see that problem and in the best case it would not be renouncing their beliefs not to wear something where it is not appropriate, but there are many other beliefs or reasons where one is excluded from official office/army, etc.
deleted by creator
Similar to the original meaning of this post. Many countries forbid people to enter the military and similar office, if they are known to hold extreme believes (e.g. extreme right wing rhetoric has been used by them or such). Not always foolproof though
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I think you are correct as it is now. And I do agree, as it is right now it is not practical to be completely secular for people holding these offices.
However, ideally, these groups would not need the recognition in this way as they ought to already have it otherwise and understanding that at some places some things are limited, should not discourage them to believe in what they want.
Do you think they’re talking about just a regular cross like you’d see on a church? Because that’s not the symbol being discussed here.
deleted by creator
First, fuck the ADL. They are so pro-fascism their own logo is now a hate-symbol. Second, the Jerusalem cross on dozens of buildings doesn’t sounds like a very significant Christian symbol. It’s very contextual. Third, you clearly haven’t looked very hard. Fourth, your conclusion is… really stupid. Stop being such a snowflake.
deleted by creator