• krolden@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a single word about holding telcos responsible for the billions they’ve been receiving over the last three decades and only used it to lobby to lower the definition of broadband to 25mbps

    No Q&A either.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, because you don’t go over the details of implementation during rollout speeches. No one would pay attention if you did. The coverage has the details your comment claims don’t exist and we’ll as the enforcement mechanisms you’re positive are absent.

    • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I posted this in another comment, but from the article:

      The amount each state, territory and Washington, D.C., will receive from the $42.5 billion program depends primarily on the number of unserved locations in each jurisdiction or those locations that lack access to internet speeds of at least 25 megabits per second download and 3 Mbps upload.

      and

      States will have until the end of the year to submit initial proposals outlining how they plan to use the money, which won’t begin to be distributed until those plans are approved

      and

      Under the rules of the program, states must prioritize connecting predominantly unserved areas before bolstering service in underserved areas, or those without access to internet speeds of 100 Mbps/20 Mbps, and community anchor institutions, such as schools and libraries.

      So not exactly, “without stipulations”