• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not precisely humans but the ancient placental mammal lineage that includes humans, dogs, and bats.

    Obviously. That’s how evolution works. Everything alive today had an “ancestor” alive at the time of the dinosaurs, and before the time of the dinosaurs.

  • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like the news is in the details here, that non-biologists won’t really understand or appreciate. Because as far as I know it’s not news that small mammals co-existed with dinosaurs.

    I distinctly remember learning (as a kid) that mammals survived it because they were small, could breed often, and produced lots of offspring… so they could evolutionally adapt quickly.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ”Not precisely humans but the ancient placental mammal lineage that includes humans, dogs, and bats.”

    In one documentary, these mammals were depicted as four legged rat sized animals. Not something I would call humans, but I guess writers need to make living too.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s only logical, but I guess it’s worth repeating how evolution works. Also humans keep coexisting with dinosaurs succesfully.

    • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If dogs come from wolves, why are there still wolves? Some things change during their lifecycles (like caterpillars to butterflies or tadpoles to frogs). Other things change between generations. Not everything in a classification has to change.