I feel like the last 2 frames are missing a subscript
I don’t think a caption would improve the vampire panel, the joke is pretty self evident.
Yeah those are some goofy ass shoes
What shoes?
Those are shoe-pants.
From what I can tell, he’s got no pants, and has heels glued to the bottom of his feet
I really don’t get the bottom-right one
The artist just thought if cows made tools they’d be primitive and weird-looking.
you read my mind. I had the exact thought:
is this the cow tools of today
The kid’s been breaking the windows one-by-one with a paddle ball.
That’s a literally interpretation, but what is the joke? That even with the ball being on a string the kid still found a way to break all the windows?
my guess is an arcade game where you break all the windows, kid saw it and did it irl?
honestly I don’t understand like 50% of the comics here, I just see pixels and laugh 😅
This has such a tom the dancing bug feel. Love the hunter deer one.
The moose one gave me Far Side memories. Actually most of them did.
As a deer hunter I accept the deer’s proposal. Lotta stress put on that shot, go ahead.
i get the vampire one but what’s with the others?
The invisible man is upset because his hot bar crush doesn’t know he exists (how could she, the dude’s invisible)
Hunters enjoy the sport of hunting. It would take the fun away if the animal killed itself. The deer is running a lose-lose gambit by killing itself
Kid loves smashing windows or sumn
The invisible man is upset because his hot bar crush doesn’t know he exists (how could she, the dude’s invisible)
I missed it the first time too, but that isn’t what he’s saying. She probably doesn’t even know I don’t exist. It’s got a double-negative. If you cancel them out, you get: “She probably
doesn’t evenknow(s) Idon’texist.”you cannot just cancel out negations like that
he does not exist and she doesn’t know it
This reminds me of Shrek when Pinocchio gets around lying by saying “I don’t know where he’s not,” but if you think about it for one second you’ll see that knowing where someone is also means you know where they aren’t at. So it’s still a lie.
maybe they’re in a quantum superposition, you can never be sure
Then you don’t know where he is!
no, if you know one of the places where he is you can just observe him and he will be there and then you know exactly where he is and is not
I interpret it as her being unaware of his nonexsistence.
