• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained data the same way OpenAI did. –FTFY

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    OMG Competition!

    QUICK, they’re a foreign threat! They’re coming right for us!!!

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    When a writer copies someone else’s work without cites or compensation, it’s called “plagiarism.” But when an AI does it, it’s called “LLM training.”

  • Deepus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    What the fuck is Microsoft getting involved for?! Maybe concentrate on not providing shitty fucking software fuck heads!

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Stealing from thieves isn’t a crime.

    Especially not when China turns around and Robin Hoods it back to the world.

    Just saying.

    • LappingDog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Making R1 open source really makes it such a big FU to all the grifters asking for billions for AI in the us. Especially funny because high-flyer is a hedge fund firm themselves. The ai race should only be determined by what you do with it, not protecting how much IP you hoovered up and are now trying to cry about it being copied by others.

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol its like fucking lavrov from fucking russia screaming “this is against international law” when Europe froze their assets.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bro… US reaction here is so pathetic…

      The behavior is indicative of a bigger issue. They really do think only they are allowed to cheat and steal to win lol

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    “You can’t steal that public data! We stole it first!”

    And considering that’s exactly what Microsoft did to Apple with point and click, what irony!

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Chinese company:

      Truly, you have a dizzling intellect.

      Microsoft:

      AND IM JUST GETTING STARTED! Where was I?

      Chinese company:

      Stealing data…

    • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, NOW it’s a problem, though! Because it’s someone else doing the same thing, someone who isn’t part of the human centipede starting at Trump’s colon.

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s the game plan if they did?

    Trade restrictions?

    China already proved those did fuck all to stop them from developing their own model.

    Ducking knew this ai bubble would burst sooner or later, just glad we can finally get on with it now.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I ducking knew it too, I’ve been a long for the ride though. The models still do have some niche applications where they’re actually useful.

      This whole thing with OpenAI and Microsoft whinging about fair play is truly laughable though. What clowns.

      As a side note, it took a few tries to write ducking, my keyboard kept correcting it to fucking. We’re definitely 2 different people. Lol.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago
      1. Name the company involved a military asset
      2. Forbid US companies from hosting the models
      3. Pressure foreign companies to not work with them