I need some advice regarding which distro to choose. I tried installing fedora workstation on my laptop as test and it seemed quite annoying to get the user interface right.

I dont mind the technical differences, in fact i’m looking forward to them as linux is more secure and better designed.

The problem i’m having is that i want the good things from windows desktop. for example; tray icons, being able to control filesystem easily with gui, shortcuts on desktop.

Every distro i have tried or seen has been really basic regarding this out of the box with very little customization options. I prefer not having to download million extensions for every little feature that might stop working at every major update or if developer doesnt feel like continuing.

I also would like to be able to easily backup customization settings so i dont have to do everything again if i need to reinstall. I like being able to easily customize everything so having a lot of settings is good thing for me.

I read somewhere about kde plasma and screenshots seemed promising and downloaded kde fedora. Haven’t installed it yet but am I on the right track for what i’m looking for? Are there other even better choices? I’d like to nail this from the start so I dont have to reinstall later. I really dont want to wade through every possible distro.


Thank you all, you have been big help

  • Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Though I occasionally really get support requests for old printers, scanners and whatever people have around.

    These work fine on immutable distros if they work on normal distros, for fedora atomic you can install just about anything with rpm-ostree, in these cases, i just send them a message with the command for the thing they need to install.

    Or they have their accustomed workflow and they don’t really want to change a lot and also migrate their data to several different programs…

    If they’re completely unwilling to do this, linux is probably not a good idea for them in the first place, tbh.

    I think one thing won’t change though and that is the big selling point of Linux having a big package repository. That just has a lot of advantages, also for the beginners. And the maintainers invest a lot of time so everything works smoothly. And it makes it stupidly easy to do a lot of things.

    You can install any normal packages in fedora kinoite/bazzite, actually, because of rpm-ostree, this isn’t really a disadvantage of immutable distros, and in fact, the largest, most up to date distro is nixos, which is immutable too!

    I mean ultimately the details don’t matter. My mom doesn’t need the latest Firefox or some specific operating system design. She just needs something that gets the job done and is maintainable and maybe not a hassle to operate and maintain…

    Precisely why I recommend immutability, things being absolutely rock solid, and easily being able to rollback mean there’s no downtime where things are just broken.

    The downsides are all for hardcore users, in my experience.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Hehe, yeah my experience with Linux doesn’t reflect the beginners perspective anyways. So I sometimes struggle to empathize. But I’m trying to keep up to date.

      I don’t think I really agree with the graph and it’s implications on the real world. I’ve recently switched from Debian to NixOS on my private VPS. And while I now have access to NixOS unstable… I must say the number of services I had to package on my own and had to mess with… hasn’t really gone down substantially. I mean it certainly has a lot of packages. But you end up doing a lot of packaging and installing anyways. At least in my experience. So I think that graph is a bit misleading if you try to infer how easy it is to install some random software.

      And yeah, if something like a printer/scanner combo is supported in Linux, it’s usually easy to get it going on any Linux distro. Issues start to arise once it’s some old device from 2010 with bad drivers. Up until now my relatives either threw them away after some Windows update made them unusable. Or I convinced them to use Linux and that has support. Or you need to mess around with some old driver packages that depend on old and conflicting libraries, libc versions etc. I think it’s a shame to waste some good printer/scanner. And usually if you replace a device that has done a good job for 10+ years, and your relatives replace that with a recent consumer printer, they’re not always better off. These things have been enshittified constantly and the new printer will just have random quirks, refuse to print or scan or do other shenanigans. I’d rather not make this call. And instead keep using the printer that has proven to do it’s job very well.

      But as I said, I’ll have to try. Not using a traditional distro should offer some advantages for those use cases. Maybe it’ll get easier to install conflicting (old) library versions for some half proprietary crap. Because that’s something Debian based distributions aren’t really made for…