• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This will last exactly as long as it takes somebody to fly a drone into the side of the White House. Not any kind of special drone, just some idiot trying to get a cool shot for their YouTube channel.

      • Etterra@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Okay that sounds cool and in my brain it’s like having the turrets and starcraft spin around to shoot stuff down, but in real life I know it’s just an EMF jamming field, if that much.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          It would still need to be a turret with a focused beam as drone controls operate on the same frequency range as wifi and bluetooth so if you still want those to work in the building you can’t just fill the air with enough noise to block a drone. And if you want to stop one on auto-pilot you need to scramble GPS signals which would be a very bad idea when nearest airport just 3 miles away with one one the runways aligned directly with the White House. And even that’s all just assuming it’s actually using standard frequencies and not something custom.

          So while anti-drone systems don’t go BRRRT, they can still end up looking like something that could.

      • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve done some work related to the anti drone systems and I assure you even the best of the best is an absolute joke against all but the most naive operator. The ultimate drone defense right now is somewhere between magnum #6 bird and #4 turkey shot :/

        • If said work was more than a year ago then it is significantly outdated.

          Watch perun’s videos covering drone warfare in Ukraine it gives a good overview of what has been tried and its effective.

          The us government absolutely can shoot down a couple hundred dollar drone its just a matter of if they need to use a half a million dollar intercepted to do it.

          • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Ah a fellow perun addict.

            Honestly I think he oversold the effectiveness of the systems. The work I did is still ongoing so I’m up to speed on the available systems, though mostly on the RF side. If you watch the stuff coming out of Ukraine the drones aren’t really being impeded all that much and if you know how to use ardupilot and selectively enable your data link you can pretty much get away with whatever you want because the US isn’t gonna allow anyone to jam GPS right next to multiple major airports. If you want to avoid even relying on GPS there are starting to be mature solutions out there too.