HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • Tinidril@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    without any exaggeration, going to result in several thousand dead children.

    I sincerely doubt it. The impact is limited to trans children of active service members who do not have a second parent with health insurance. Furthermore, trans healthcare for kids generally means puberty blockers, not surgeries or other expensive interventions. As far as I can gather, that’s about $5k-$12k per year if insurance pays, and likely lower with self pay discounts. That’s easily doable with a GoFundMe.

    None of that is to say it’s OK. I’m just addressing the assertion of thousands of deaths.

    Nobody should be thrown under the bus, but political reality in a split government says that someone will be. This gave Republicans the hate fix they so desperately wanted with probably less impact than with any other group. I still agree it sucks, but without knowing what the alternatives were, it’s not rational to assume Democrats just didn’t care to do better.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There are about 2 million minors on Tricare. Around 1% of the population is trans, then that’s 20,000 kids. The suicide attempt rate among trans kids untreated is about 40%. If only a quarter of those succeed, that’s 2,000 dead kids among Tricare’s current enrollees.

      Now your despicable suggestion that people rely on GoFundMe for their life-saving healthcare? Or your hope that most families on Tricare have good insurance through their other partner? When military famously move so much that the other partner mantaining a good job is difficult? Those have obvious problems with them. The GoFundMe is a particularly demonic suggestion. Suffice it so say that no, thousands of families of trans kids are not going to find donors for thousands a year on fucking GoFundMe. This is healthcare, and that is what health insurance is for.

      So yes, thousands of dead children is not in any way an exaggeration. Congress just willingly voted to murder several thousand children. And people like you are perfectly happy with it, as you do not consider trans people to be human beings.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The percentage of people who attempt suicide and eventually succeed is actually more like 10-15%. Receiving medical treatment is a factor in whether a trans child attempts suicide, but it is only one of many, and not the most important. In 2022 Tricare had a total of 2,500 kids receiving some form of gender affirming care, a far cry from your estimate of 20,000. I really don’t want to quibble too much on the numbers because 1 kid is too many, but it’s not going to be thousands in any case.

        I was also not talking specifically about puberty blockers, not mental healthcare in general. Where I was mistaken, is that puberty blockers are actually not impacted by this bill at all, and will still be made available. Since you are an apparent activist on this issue, I would have thought that was something you would have caught. The treatments being disallowed are specifically those that might “result in sterilization” - treatments that are rarely ever performed on trans minors. I want to be clear here in saying that this does not mean I think the change is OK.

        Now your despicable suggestion that people rely on GoFundMe for their life-saving healthcare?

        Lets be clear about the nature of my suggestion. It’s analogous to explaining how two people can share a gas mask in a chemical attack. It’s not how I think it should work, but it’s an option that’s better than nothing. My perspective is that the only people who should be involved in these decisions are doctors, patients, and if applicable patients. Medical care should be a right, but I know that’s not where things are today - for anyone.

        And, again, we don’t know what was on the table that might have been even worse. What we do know is that if the bill didn’t get passed that all healthcare benefits would be impacted for every military family, not to mention delays in pay. If the Democrats held a hard line and refused to compromise, the Republicans could just hold off a month and bypass the Democrats altogether. Then we might actually have seen all gender affirming care pulled, instead of just care for minors that might result in sterilization.

        I’ll say this again too. I don’t give the Democrats a complete pass on this. In this particular situation I don’t think they had a choice, but in the past several years they have avoided this topic almost completely and allowed Republicans to frame the entire issue. I have deep problems with what Democrats did leading up to this situation that helped put them in this spot.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Nobody should be thrown under the bus, but political reality in a split government says that someone will be.

      What group did Republicans object to throwing under the bus?

      Oh yeah, that only ever works one way, and it only ever works with people that Democrats consider expendable.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        What group did Republicans object to throwing under the bus?

        What? Who said they did? Republicans need to throw someone under the bus. That’s fascist strategy 101. They just don’t care who it is.

        people that Democrats consider expendable.

        Let’s put you in charge of the party then. Who do you choose to sacrifice instead? The Republicans are going to insist on some red meat. If the bill gets pushed off until January 20, it’s just going to result in far worse for more people. One small charity could completely mitigate this issue for everyone, so why aren’t you working on that?

        This is just the beginning of the shit this country will be dealing with for at least the next couple of years. If the Democrats don’t absolutely crush it in 2026, it will be a lot longer than that. You want to play these fucking games and pretend that Democrats are the enemy, then the blood can be on your hands.

        I say this fully aware that the Democrats are on the wrong side of lots of issues that I care about, but there is no issue where they are worse than the Republicans. We can help by fixing the culture. Politicians are not good at doing the work of activists. (And activists generally make lousy politicians.)

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          What? Who said they did? Republicans need to throw someone under the bus. That’s fascist strategy 101.

          And Democrats play along. That’s complicity 101.

          Let’s put you in charge of the party then. Who do you choose to sacrifice instead?

          Your question is based on the incorrect assumption that fascists are happy when they have achieved the sacrifice of one group. Who do you choose to sacrifice next? Because there will be a next. The trans people you consider expendable? When Republicans move on to the next entry on their “then they came for” list, there is one fewer entry between you and being the group Democrats are willing to jettison to save the dwindling whole.

          One small charity could completely mitigate this issue for everyone, so why aren’t you working on that?

          I know why you aren’t. In my case, this happened yesterday. But hey, anyone who describes a problem has to singlehandedly solve it as it happens, or nothing they say is valid.

          This is just the beginning of the shit this country will be dealing with for at least the next couple of years.

          Yup. Democrats shoveling vulnerable populations into the maw in an effort they know to be in vain to placate implacable fascists.

          You want to play these fucking games and pretend that Democrats are the enemy, then the blood can be on your hands.

          Democrats are culpable for their complicity. You just want no accountability as your party turns quisling.

          I say this fully aware that the Democrats are on the wrong side of lots of issues that I care about,

          They’re on the wrong side of a lot of issues you don’t consider important too.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It’s not about making fascists “happy”, and no, I have no delusions on that account, and I don’t consider anyone expendable. But, if we went into the next administration without a defense funding bill, Republicans would still get what they did, and have the chance to attach anything else they wanted as well. The choice the Democrats had was this, or worse than this, so Biden signed.

            Going into the next administration, Democrats will have zero power to be complicit in anything. The people “shoveling vulnerable populations into the maw” will be Republicans - the same people that do it today.

            You just want no accountability as your party turns quisling.

            Wow, you have no fucking clue how I feel about holding Democrats accountable. I just hold them accountable for the things they actually have power over. I’ve ripped Harris to shreds over her cowardly hiding from trans issues in the campaign, and Biden before that. I’ve been advocating for overthrowing the Democratic establishment for 30 years.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              39 minutes ago

              But, if we went into the next administration without a defense funding bill, Republicans would still get what they did, and have the chance to attach anything else they wanted as well.

              They will have the ability to pass anything they want as a standalone bill. That’s no reason for Democrats to be complicit now. This is the last word trans people will get from Democrats for a long time.

              The choice the Democrats had was this, or worse than this, so Biden signed.

              Worse than this is already inevitable. Democrats could have chosen to not do this. And let’s not pretend that this was reluctant, either. Not with the sheer numbers of Democratic votes this got. And this is after a campaign season during which Democrats ran ads with Republican anti-trans bigotry.

              Going into the next administration, Democrats will have zero power to be complicit in anything.

              So they’re taking advantage of the opportunity now.

              Wow, you have no fucking clue how I feel about holding Democrats accountable.

              You’ve been making excuses for them throwing trans people under the bus here.

              I just hold them accountable for the things they actually have power over.

              And their hands are always conveniently tied.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I say this fully aware that the Democrats are on the wrong side of lots of issues that I care about, but there is no issue where they are worse than the Republicans. We can help by fixing the culture. Politicians are not good at doing the work of activists. (And activists generally make lousy politicians

          Pro war Democrats are worse on the issue of foreign policy than the 1 or 2 anti war Republicans.

          They’re worse only on foreign policy, but they are worse.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            1 or 2 Republicans? That’s such a creative way to do logic that I’m impressed!

            Yeah, I totally concede. Straight up. In fact, I’ll bet that the average Democrat is worse than 1 or 2 Republicans on every issue! You fucking got me, LOL.

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Disapproving something only takes a single counter example. You’ve obviously never taken a class on Logic since you seem to believe otherwise.

              EDIT: Here is the beginner level text book on how that logic works, if you want to actually learn something: click to actually learn about logic! 😀

              Thomas Massie, an absolute shit bird of an evil human being has better foreign policy views on Iarael then Biden, or any Democratic member that supports the genocide.

              He is wrong on everything else.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                You’re lecturing me on logic yet you haven’t even mastered basic reading comprehension. “Republicans” is not the same as “all Republicans” or “every Republican”. Had I used either of those you might have had a point but I didn’t because I’m not an idiot.