Mine is mapping. I am a big OpenStreetMap contributor and I have mapped many towns near me that were previously completely unmapped.

  • fool@programming.dev
    4·
    12 hours ago

    Oh my God I LOVE FONTS

    Spartan is a bit wide for me (see that w?) but Lato with a good colorscheme is always sexy

    Another thing: if you’re familiar with fonts you can have a weird pseudo-Sherlock funtime guessing how something was made.

    points This book is using Georgia instead of Times New Roman. See how the 9 is low? But the page numbers are Times New Roman because the 9 isn’t low. Was paging in the author’s control?

    and

    font with the light blue shading thing. This club recruitment poster was made in Microsoft Word.

    About serif disdain… what about LaTeX’s serif? :}

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      1·
      2 hours ago

      If you’re into Computer Modern, almost all modern tech variants (not Knuths original) are too light in print. If you look at his printed books from back in the day the letters are thicker. It’s just a consequence of using one technology instead of the printing tech the font was designed for. Same thing (but more extreme) happened to Centaur btw.
      Check out the pictures of CM here: https://www.levien.com/type/cmr/gain.html

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      8 hours ago

      Brick?

      Anyway, maybe you have some insight - any idea why so many web designers prefer Light or Hairline now? Or at any rate the thinnest possible fonts? Did someone with credibility announce that thin fonts are actually easier to read, or is it just a style trend?