GamerBoy705@lemmy.worldM to Software Gore@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoNot good enough for 100%pxscdn.comimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1537arrow-down16
arrow-up1531arrow-down1imageNot good enough for 100%pxscdn.comGamerBoy705@lemmy.worldM to Software Gore@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarehalvar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up49arrow-down5·edit-21 year agowell 0.9999… is actually 1 because x = 0.9999... 10x = 9.9999... 10x (9.9999...) - x (0.9999...) = 9 9x = 9 x = 1 so 0.9999... is 1
minus-squareRedditWanderer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44·1 year agoThis is muuuch better demonstrated by 1/3 = .33… 2/3 = .66… 3/3 = 0.99… “Repeating” matters in approximations
minus-squareexscape@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down2·1 year agoYes, but 0.99999999999999999999 isn’t 0.999… and therefore not 1, so it’s still wrong.
minus-squarehalvar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoThe software is wrong yes. I just had to share this information.
minus-squareexpatriado@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoyour 4th line reads as 10x^2 - x^2 = 9
minus-squarehalvar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoYou know I didn’t mean it like that, but you are technically right.
minus-squarethedoodlenoodle@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoFirst thing that came to mind was this video by SingingBanana. Great maths channel and he is a frequently on numberphile as well.
minus-squarecheery_coffee@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
well 0.9999… is actually 1 because
This is muuuch better demonstrated by
1/3 = .33… 2/3 = .66… 3/3 = 0.99…
“Repeating” matters in approximations
Yes, but 0.99999999999999999999 isn’t 0.999… and therefore not 1, so it’s still wrong.
The software is wrong yes. I just had to share this information.
your 4th line reads as 10x^2 - x^2 = 9
You know I didn’t mean it like that, but you are technically right.
First thing that came to mind was this video by SingingBanana.
Great maths channel and he is a frequently on numberphile as well.
0.999… is lim(1), not 1.
deleted by creator
What?
1 is a constant so lim(1) = 1