Frozen Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
farcaster@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

Intel Announces Retirement of CEO Pat Gelsinger

www.intc.com

external-link
message-square
125
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@zerobytes.monster
  • hardware@zerobytes.monster
  • hardware@lemmy.world
384
external-link

Intel Announces Retirement of CEO Pat Gelsinger

www.intc.com

farcaster@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
125
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@zerobytes.monster
  • hardware@zerobytes.monster
  • hardware@lemmy.world
  • Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Losing 16 billion dollars totally has nothing to do with this at all. Its time for Pat to pursue some creative hobbies at home, enjoy his retirement, and be with his family. There are no American troops in Baghdad, everything is fine, Intel is fine, and will soon be back to doing great things. Just ask Userbenchmark, Intel products are the best in class and highly sought after. nVidia has no real advantage in the AI race, and Intel is just dominating.

    That 16 billion is just a brief hiccup, company is totally about to do great.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe now they can forget all the expensive chipmaking and get back to their core business of stock buybacks.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s probably the real reason. He was going to invest all that money instead of doing more stock buybacks. What an idiot!

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          With the CHIPS Act funding they can’t do stock buybacks.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It just frees up other money for buybacks that they would have had to waste on R&D.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              deleted by creator

              • ikidd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, at least one stupid fucker disagrees with that idea…

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This simultaneously made me laugh and sad. Sad because I have heavy investments in Intel.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well their stock price just jumped up after this announcement.

          • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            To less than what it was a month ago.

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              And more than what it will be next month.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The sentiment was not bad. TSMC is a shining example of how fab subsidies can be a good idea, and Intel’s fabs going under is bad and basically irreplaceable. Like… I am still happy with my tax dollars taking the risk, and Intel was clearly trying to right the ship when CHIPS was conceived.

          But theres clearly rot in Intel. Thats a big difference I guess, as TSMC was built from the ground up (in a time where that was possible) while Intel is already weighed down with its sins.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            deleted by creator

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where do you get the 100 billion USD amount from?
              AFAIK Intel has received less than $10 billion.

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                deleted by creator

                • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  sharebuy back is cash transfer to shareholders.

                  That is simply not true, and Intel has only gotten less than $10 billion from CHIPS.

                  https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/us-chips-act-intel-direct-funding.html

                  AFAIK they’ve actually only received 1 billion of that.

                  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    deleted by creator

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        While we’re at it, let’s go back to 10nm chips too. That’s Intel’s bread and butter. Phones get bigger every year. Why not transistors too?

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      userbenchmark should not be trusted.

      https://gizmosphere.org/stop-using-userbenchmark/

      • Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My comment was dripping with sarcasm, I refer to them as “Loserbenchmark” most anytime they come up. Complete toolbag shill assholes over there, lol.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          deleted by creator

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.72K users / day
  • 7.33K users / week
  • 14.4K users / month
  • 32.6K users / 6 months
  • 18 local subscribers
  • 76.8K subscribers
  • 17K Posts
  • 739K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org