• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Kids all across the US are waiting at the bus in the dark anyway.

    Not everyone gets to get on a bus after sunrise.

    The better answer is to just quit switching altogether, and socially adjust everything to x hours pre mid-day sun.

    With everything being connected these days it’s trivial (hell, industrial clocks have been tied to electrical frequency since 1900, so it’s always been trivial to compensate them).

    If “6am” slowly moved every day due to when mid-day sun/sunrise occurs, no one would even notice.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      Maybe instead of focusing on 6 am we just accept that noon makes sense as when the sun is highest in the sky (or close as we can get with timezones) and that the time the sun comes up will change throughout the year.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I say keep the time at either at ST or DST and let the different institutions/businesses decide their hours of operation. I’ll bet you after a year or two, 99% will settle on something and keep it throughout the year.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      My personal complaint is that I would have an extra hour of work in the dark, and DST does that to me anyway. My schedule is earlier than office workers and I like it.

      Even my days off are early and it’s great. I know the country is going to go permanent DST eventually and I’ll adapt, but it’s still stupid IMO.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      There’s a lot of commerce that would actually be disrupted by doing that. Software developers would certainly riot.