• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The anti-genocide group sees both main parties as driving the trolley. They would like them to just maybe hit the brake, noone needs to be run over. They see the lever as irrelevant because again just please stop the trolley.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Unfortunately, that argument doesn’t fit with one of the primary aspects of The Trolley Problem - it involves a runaway trolley. The obviously-preferred solution to “stop the trolley” isn’t an option, because stopping the trolley isn’t possible.

      Edit: Can’t tell what about this comment deserved so many downvotes? I imagine we all agree that “stopping” the Trolley would be best, but the real life “Trolley” (ie the current genocide) is just as unstoppable (between now and election day) as the metaphorical one. It’s horrible, I agree, but protest-voting third party (or arguing to just “stop the Trolley”) isn’t a solution.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        that argument doesn’t fit with one of the primary aspects of The Trolley Problem - it involves a runaway trolley. The obviously-preferred solution to “stop the trolley” isn’t an option, because stopping the trolley isn’t possible.

        hold my blunt while I butcher this metaphor:

        from Wikipedia

        Reversing the points under a moving train will almost always derail the train.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Of course, but how can we “reverse the points under” the current election and derail the “genocide train”? Voting third party isn’t going to cut it.