ROFL. Okay. We’re done here. Nothing anyone says will ever overcome that cognitive dissonance of yours. And I’m not about to waste any time attempting to.
ROFL. Okay. We’re done here. Nothing anyone says will ever overcome that cognitive dissonance of yours. And I’m not about to waste any time attempting to.
I did. That how I know about her index fund investment.
That “article” was written by a conspiracy theorist, not a journalist.
ROFL. Okay. We’re done here. Nothing anyone says will ever overcome that cognitive dissonance of yours. And I’m not about to waste any time attempting to.
Did you look up what an index fund was?
ROFL. Okay. We’re done here. Nothing anyone says will ever overcome that cognitive dissonance of yours. And I’m not about to waste any time attempting to.
Conspiracy theorists always run from the debate when their evidence is questioned
Shill apologists always question anything that disagrees with their bullshit.
https://newrepublic.com/article/186004/green-jill-stein-2024-election
A much better article. It confirms my position and destroys yours.
Nothing about Stein being a Russian asset, only that “Jill Stein is a useful idiot for Russia.” Which, after that photo, is undeniable.
It also repeats my point about investments. “To be clear, making use of mutual and index funds is an extremely common practice in Washington”
Read it again, bud. But this time not from the perspective of an ass-kissing apologist.
It somehow reads different when you’re capable of free-thinking.
Yup. Same conclusion. Bad green party leader but no mention of being a Russian asset.