• Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    I understand the actual market reasons that buybacks and layoffs raise a stock price, but it’s always been counter-intuitive to me that shrinking the workforce that actually produces the capital and divesting money that could have been used to grow the company would be seen as positive indicators to investors.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is a strategy, pioneered by the old GE C-levels, of spinning out operations and outsourcing departments in such a way that your real business is simply accumulating rent-generating properties. Rather than operating a factory that makes light bulbs or turbine fans, you own the factory and lease it to a smaller and less profitable company that actually runs it. Rather than paying engineers to design the next iteration of airframe, you look for a small company of draftsmen that has a new airframe and buy it, then fire all the draftsmen and license the specs on the airframe design the company owns.

      When you have very cheap borrowing costs and you can identify instances in which start-up companies paid their employees below the market rate for their cutting edge work, you can find huge arbitrage opportunities. Take none of the risk of a tentative project, turn the owner of the company into a mega-millionaire overnight, and dispense with the labor costs associated with professionals.

      Over the long term, this destroys the base of knowledge you need to make iterative improvements to any of the shit you’re now leasing out to third parties. So you’re stuck with a more traditional air frame for decades, you straight up lose the ability to produce wide body jets like the DC-10, and the folks you outsourced all the real physical labor have no long-term interest in quality control since everyone knows they’re disposable.

      But by the time that moment rolls around, you’ve made yourself a billionaire several times over and diversified your portfolio out of your own company’s stock. You’re untouchable and its someone else’s problem to deal with a company coasting on fumes and broken promises.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Here’s the real story. Those few years of near zero lending got corps hooked on the Yellen yayo and they ain’t been right since. Now the only option is somehow to gut your operation expenses to offset your batshit crazy capex.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because many investors can’t see past the next quarterly report. Value investing is hard and requires homework.