As a non-American, I don’t know exactly how your polling works, but why am I seeing “plan your voting day” or “set a voting strategy” like they’ve done on the Cards Against Humanity voting campaign?

Where I live, it’s just show up on voting day and cast your ballot, or ask for a mail in ballot, or go to a special voting station if you need (or want) to vote early. Is it the same in the US, and this is just getting people to gather those last pieces of information early and put a reminder in the calendar? Or is there more to it than that?

Thanks!

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait what? And that sort of things is legal? Are you serious? You know, there are countries where voting is obligatory, and others where it is made as easy as possible.

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait til you learn about Gerrymandering. I’ll not get into it in depth, but essentially the local/state government in the US will set up voting regions to guarantee that one party has a massive advantage.

      • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I like how I vividly remember learning about this in middle school and being told it’s illegal, then as an adult I just see it happening???

        • visor841@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s only illegal federally to gerrymander to dilute minorities. Otherwise it’s up to the individual states.

      • stoned_ape@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bruh the shit going on in Ohio this election cycle where LaRose has reworded (see also the abortion amendment where his “summary” was longer than the actual text of the amendment) the ballot to obfuscate the actual intent of Issue 1 to make people vote No which helps consolidate the Republicans grip

        It’s ridiculous. My wife is relatively intelligent and she doesn’t understand the wording on the ballot and I explained to her that despite the reading, a No vote will continue the status quo. Like I’m a free speech kind of guy but just put the damn text on the damn ballot like don’t bullshit us Frankie!

        Fuckin schmucks

        • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          But if they don’t do everything they can to obfuscate the ramifications of voting No then everyone would vote Yes!

          They know what they’re doing is against the wishes of the majority, otherwise they would put the choices in plain language, or weight the obfuscation the other way…

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Wait what? And that sort of things is legal?

      Technically no, if it can be proven that the goal is racial discrimination specifically. Every so often there’s a lawsuit claiming just that. Problem is, it tends to get resolved by the Supreme Court which is two-thirds chosen by the “let’s make it harder to vote” party.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s cool but the post was clearly about the USA where they have made voting a miserable fucking experience.