• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not here. This is not linux desktop share where every actor is an independent agent and all options are viable. Xorg is developed by the same people doing Wayland, and they decided Xorg is dead and will only receive security updates. I agree that Wayland compatibility is still not fully mature. But unfortunately for all those devs the upgrade window is moving fast and eventually their software will be left behind unless they change to Wayland. At this point Xorg is not even the default anymore.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I fully expect people to keep using a broken Xorg, not move into wayland, and not fork and keep it updated.

      But the devs are free to do whatever they want. No opinions there. I wouldn’t want to maintain Xorg either.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Totally, nothing in Linux land ever truly dies. Someone, somewhere will surely fork it once it is never updated anymore. But I wouldn’t want to be that person either.

        • Communist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If somebody was willing to do this, xorg would still be maintained.

          xorg is actually legitimately so terrible to work on that nobody is interested in doing this who actually knows how xorg works.