Looks like Roblaw’s at it again… robbing the working class to keep obscene profits rolling to the Parasite Class. And I bet the farmer who raised those turkeys get only a few dollars per.

  • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh nooo, now paying someone to take an animal’s life is expensive. Oh, the horror!

    • AlmightyTritan@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think even if you don’t eat meat there’s reason to be mad. Cause they killed a bunch of animals, and put it at prices where people can’t afford to buy and thus might have even more waste. So a triple whammy of corporate greed, excessive animal farming, and food waste!

      On the plus side maybe people will be forced to buy more ethically farmed turkeys this year, or reduce meat intake all together, cause its looking like these are more expensive then any locally grown Turkeys I’ve seen.

      For additional context on my take: I do eat meat, despite being morally against factory farming. So, I try to reduce my intake of unethically farmed food and try to use as much of the animal as possible.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        People will see the high price, decide not to get a turkey, and make roast potatoes or something instead. Hopefully something vegan, like roast potatoes.

        I like it better when the dead animal rots on the shelves. Because it means that the company that killed an animal made a financial loss, and next quarter they might decide to reduce their stock, since people aren’t buying. If people buy the dead animal, then the animal killers make money and they keep killing animals. If it becomes more profitable to kill half the turkeys and sell at double the price, then I’m glad. That’s half as many dead turkeys. That’s a good thing. I hope the economy is going that way. And I hope people realise due to this economic trend that they don’t actually need to eat meat every day.

      • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t see a triple whammy, it’s a nothing burger to me.

        1. If it’s a greedy markup on top of a product that I’m against, I don’t care
        2. Excessive animal farming… exists already regardless of price passed down to consumers
        3. We don’t any evidence these turkeys are going to waste at higher rates than before yet so this is just speculation

        So personally I don’t see any reason for me to be mad, though I empathize that folks who care about having turkey have their reasons.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So you would rather they slaughter an excessive amount of animals that will then be entirely discarded, then to actually go to people to eat?

          • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            No, I would prefer to see markets selling those at a loss so they don’t make a profit and food isn’t wasted. ~And hopefully that loss motivates them to plan for less consumption next year and/or reducing the amount they’re willing to pay producers, decreasing the profitability of the meat production industry.~

            But as I said before, there’s no evidence yet that the food waste is increasing due to price increases. This is just speculation from people who wouldn’t buy the thing because they fail to imagine that there are people who would.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yes. I would rather the animals’ deaths be entirely pointless and bring zero revenue to the animal killers.

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              “Killing animals is wrong! Unless you’re pointlessly killing them so someone doesn’t profit from it!”

              Dude are you alright, cause wow, what a fucked up and incredibly disgusting view.

              • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                No, killing is still wrong when it’s pointless. You need to pay attention and take this discussion seriously. Killing that doesn’t benefit murderers is better than killing that benefits murderers, because murder shouldn’t be profitable.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It has expanded Tofurky too. the small tofu ball is now $27…Personally I would have skipped it and made something else, but my wife felt Thankagiving is not thanksgiving without Tofurki LOL

    • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh the horror everyone became vegetarian and the prices rose, and the quality became shite.