youTellMe@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoEveryday we stray further from industry standardslemmy.worldimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down11
arrow-up1188arrow-down1imageEveryday we stray further from industry standardslemmy.worldyouTellMe@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoIf that’s a pass through, that’s bad. If that’s used for authentication, authorization, credential limiting, or rate limiting, then sure.
minus-squaresebsch@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThere is no context in this world validating this level of unsanitized SQL. Even for internal use this is bad, since it bypasses the auth of server and dbms.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoThat is a very good point.
If that’s a pass through, that’s bad.
If that’s used for authentication, authorization, credential limiting, or rate limiting, then sure.
There is no context in this world validating this level of unsanitized SQL. Even for internal use this is bad, since it bypasses the auth of server and dbms.
That is a very good point.