• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well I can argue with that because Linux systems usually consume more energy than identical systems with other operating systems though they are probably less green due to having a lot of cloud and ad related tech built in.

      • featured [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Extremely dependent on a number of factors, mostly hardware and configuration. I had a Thinkpad T480 and on a stock fedora install it definitely died faster than W10, but after setting up TLP and Powertop I squeezed ~2 more hours of use out of it than Windows could manage. Ditto for my framework 13, I get all day battery life on NixOS but when I’ve tested windows on it I lose a few hours immediately

      • ColdWater@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not ture atleast on my system, I played modded Minecraft for 4 hours on performance mode and I still have 15% to spare, I also watch BCS for an season and it’s only drain 60% on power saving mode

          • ColdWater@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I used win10 1 years and I don’t remember exactly what the power consumption is like but I think it probably worse because of win10 use more on CPU and RAM for anti-malware and telemetry

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Linux systems usually consume more energy than identical systems with other operating systems

        Is this true?

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yes, at least on battery powered PCs. Other kinds of machines may be more efficient on Linux but I guess these are mostly cases when there are no big and well developed proprietary solutions for them.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Surely use-case is important? Someone running a server that’s on 24/7 vs. someone running it on a laptop or desktop that they shut down every day.

                • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I was talking about comparing the efficiency between operating systems. That requires the use case to be the same. Comparing different use cases is unfair.