• Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m pretty sure that if Microsoft provided a decent way to do what Crowdstrike does, most companies would opt for that.

    So… Sucks to suck I guess.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Uhhh they do. Defender for Endpoint. It’s available as both P1 and P2 depending on what you need.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why should MS do that? I guess if they saw a market value for it, they could. Like how Defender came to be after 20 years of third party anti-virus.

      They certainly developed the tech for it - I remember reading about some of their research circa 2000 making the OS and everything on it a database. They’ve kind of been working that direction for years (see MyLifeBits).

      I suppose they could provide an add-on tool for this, but I suspect there’s a political barrier (imagine the blowback of MS providing such a tool).