Applicants for German citizenship will be required to explicitly affirm Israel’s right to exist under a new citizenship law which came into effect on Tuesday.

The new law shortened the number of years that a person must have lived in Germany in order to obtain a passport, from eight to five years. It will also allow first-generation migrants to be dual citizens.

As part of the shake-up, new questions were added to the country’s citizenship test, including about Judaism and Israel’s right to exist.

  • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is a good decision. Antisemitism is on the rise in Germany. 4782 antisemitic incidents in 2023, which is 83% more than the year before. 58% of these incidents occured after Oct 7.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      While I don’t doubt that more Germans are becoming more antisemitic, promoting zionism does not combat antisemitism. Lord Balfor (of the Balfor Declaration), was extremely antisemitic. He was very explicit about how removing jews from Britain and getting a shiny new colony were both positives.

      But also that statistic is useless because a significant number people arrested in Germany for antisemitism since Oct 7 were Jews protesting against Israel.

      • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        5 months ago

        That article you linked does not contain anything controversial. No shit, “from the river to the sea” is forbidden in Germany and attending a forbidden demonstration where crimes are conducted has the risk of being detained.

        She was released shortly afterwards but says: “I didn’t think I would get detained for that – I was naive it turns out.”

        Don’t act like people end up in prison here for criticizing the state of Israel. People get detained for a couple of hours in the context of demonstrations all the time. Stop derailing, the article from the Qatari news agency you linked does not add anything here.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          no shit, “from the river to the sea” is forbidden in Germany

          You understand why this is fucked up right? Is it also forbidden to say “Hawaii will be free” or “Free Tibet”?

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Not every german.

              But it’s depressing every time I talk politics with one and it turns out they’re a “leftist” who’s actually a liberal, or an “anarchist” who’s a zionist, or a “green” who supported ending all nuclear power (which restarted their coal industry), an “anti-imperialist” who only opposes Germany’s enemies.

              I expect this level of ignorance from American liberals who’ve literally never had a thought outside bourgeois democracy, half of Germany was communist until 30 years ago, they don’t have an excuse.

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Is it also forbidden to say “Hawaii will be free” or “Free Tibet”?

            Of course not. This is something entirely different. /s

        • footoro@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          From the river to the sea is not forbidden in Germany. There are several court rulings on this. Ironically, when Netanyahu wants a Jewish ethnostate from the river to the sea, that is perfectly fine for the same people who erroneously claim that saying „ From the river to the sea“ would be forbidden to say.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      These statistic say little as the German police does not properly distinguish between antisemitism and anti-zionism.

      But regardless, if you are so extreme in your views that you can’t accept the existence of the state of Israel in some shape or form, you are probably not a good fit for German society.

      • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m not sure what you want to imply here. I do not see the benefit in asking the offender why they beat up the Jewish person.

        I cited numbers from a study by RIAS (Wiki, German), this is not from a police statistic.

        The study distinguishes Isreal-related antisemitism, meaning the incidents were directed against the Jewish state of Israel and denied its legitimacy. This kind of antisemitism was 52%.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Incidence does not mean “beating up” someone. Spray painting “stop the genocide in Gaza” is sometimes counted as an “antisemitic incidence” in Germany.

          • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            5 months ago

            It is by definition the same. And if you think otherwise, you can do so outside of Germany, at best outside of EU.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                5 months ago

                by any definition

                The IHRA’s definition does, so you can’t say “any”.

                That said, the IHRA definition was pretty specifically created to be zionist and a shield for Israel, and should be rejected on those grounds.

              • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The definition used by German authorities subsumes antizionism, i.e. denying Israel’s right to exist as a special form of antisemitism.

                • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It is quite reductive to say anti-zionism is just denying the right of Israel to exist. Yes, the state of Israel is a deeply zionist project but you can accept the reality of this state existing and still be opposed to the idea of zionism in general.

                  I am opposed to the idea of colonialism in general but still accept the existence of states with a colonial history.

                  • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    That’s a good point. I’ve always thought antizionism and denying Israel’s right to exist where somehow identical.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            He has been around…

            At this point he is prolly helping the anti Israel camp the brain dead takes

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Just to give an orientation: denying Israel’s right to exist, i.e. antizionism, including the Slogan: ‘From the river to the sea – Palestina shall be free’, counts as antisemitism, while criticising the Israeli government for killing civilians does not. Cheering Hamas killing Israeli civilians counts as appreciation of terror and antisemitism.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          denying Israel’s right to exist, i.e. antizionism, including the Slogan: ‘From the river to the sea – Palestina shall be free’, counts as antisemitism

          Yes, if you accept the definition of antisemitism preferred by the Israeli government, that’s true.

          It doesn’t make it true in the real world.

        • Akisamb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          including the Slogan: ‘From the river to the sea – Palestine shall be free’

          As it should, this phrase and it’s Israeli counterpart “between the sea and the Jordan there will be only Israeli sovereignty” are often accompanied by calls for mass deportation at best and genocide at worst.

          These sentences are not bad on their own, but the parties from which they originate (Hamas and Likud) have transparent desires for war crimes and genocide.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          denying Israel’s right to exist counts as antisemitism

          It’s not. Israel is an Apartheid state and can’t exist as anything but an Apartheid state.