wiki_me@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-25 months agoFreeBSD 14.1 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6.4 vs. NetBSD 10 vs. Linux Benchmarkswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down14cross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyzfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.worldopensource@lemmy.mlbsd@programming.devbsd@lemmy.sdf.org
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-linkFreeBSD 14.1 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6.4 vs. NetBSD 10 vs. Linux Benchmarkswww.phoronix.comwiki_me@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-25 months agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyzfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.worldopensource@lemmy.mlbsd@programming.devbsd@lemmy.sdf.org
minus-squarebiribiri11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoMfw CentOS Stream 9, using a kernel, compiler, and glibc version from 3 years ago, still manages to pull ahead of software released a few weeks ago on hardware released years after Stream 9’s original release.
minus-squareLeFantome@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoI assume your comment is about FreeBSD but Ubuntu 24.04 is Linux “software released a few weeks ago” and it did no better than CentOS Stream 9. FreeBSD led on quite a few benchmarks. Quite interesting.
Mfw CentOS Stream 9, using a kernel, compiler, and glibc version from 3 years ago, still manages to pull ahead of software released a few weeks ago on hardware released years after Stream 9’s original release.
I assume your comment is about FreeBSD but Ubuntu 24.04 is Linux “software released a few weeks ago” and it did no better than CentOS Stream 9.
FreeBSD led on quite a few benchmarks. Quite interesting.