• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Naw, I know some people with negative worth who still shouldn’t be suffering. In fact, I’m pretty sure they’re suffering from their lack of worth. This is a matter of ethics, not value.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those might be suffering from lack of self-worth, but making difference between people’s worth opens up a can of ethical mold. Misanthropy is one thing, but the value of human life is untouchable.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, that attitude is simple evolutionary pressure to stay alive. The value of a human is no different from the value of a cow ethically, and I’ll eat cow. I don’t want either to suffer. Some people are economically far less valuable than cows.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cultural evolution > Social Darwinism

          Do you eat human? From a “farm”? Or shot “in the wild”?

          Right to exist is not touched by effort.

          Do you know what would reduce suffering for both cow and human?