• deleted @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless the users themselves are directly posting links to the content and hosting it (the pirated content) on lemmy, no instance would be held liable. Anyone defending this has no idea what the fuck they are talking about.

    • Leraje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a bit naive, knowing what we know about the sharks that run the large media corporations. For your average instance owner, it’s not a question of being found not liable, it’s the fact that you as an ordinary guy with an ordinary life and an ordinary income suddenly have to defend yourself legally with all the exposure and expense that entails, from day one.

      • deleted @sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean the cases that are almost always thrown out in court? You mean the cases where said sharks have to pay the defendant?

        • Leraje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know about you but engaging a lawyer and going to court to defend myself would be a massive financial drain. And to risk that on simply the hope that a court might find in my favour is far too big of a risk. Then add on all the unwanted public exposure, the internet notoriety etc. Fuck that.