I’ve been seeing a worrying number of these people on Lemmy lately, sharing enlightened takes including but not limited to “voting for Biden is tantamount to fascism” and “the concept of an assigned gender, or even an assigned name, at birth is transphobic” and none of them seem to be interested in reading more than the first sentence of any of my comments before writing a reply.

More often than not they reply with a concern I addressed in the comment they’re replying to, without any explanation of why my argument was invalid. Some of them cannot even state their own position, instead simply repeatedly calling mine oppressive in some way.

It occurred to me just now that these interactions reminded me of nothing so much as an evangelical Christian I got into an argument with on Matrix a while ago, in which I met him 95% of the way, conceded that God might well be real and that being trans was sinful and tried to convince him not to tell that to every trans person he passed, and failed. I am 100% convinced he was trolling – in retrospect I’m pretty sure I could’ve built a municipal transport system by letting people ride on top of his goalposts (that’s what I get for picking a fight with a Christian at 2AM) – and the only reason I’m not convinced these leftists on Lemmy are trolls is the sheer fucking number of them.

I made this post and what felt like half the responses fell into this category. Am I going insane?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    and none of them seem to be interested in reading more than the first sentence of any of my comments before writing a reply.

    I feel like that’s the important bit of what OP typed.

    OP wants to make 20 claims in one comment, and expects anyone that replies to address all 20 in depth.

    That’s known as a Gish Gallop. The point of it is to overrwhelm someone with so many false claims that they can’t respond to them all.

    OP is claiming that instead of people doing that, they stop and address the first untrue thing OP has claimed…

    Which is apparently their first sentence the majority of the time.

    But the fundamental overall point of complaints like OP, is they feel there shouldn’t be standards if you’re on the same “team”. Which ironically is what it’s like for devout religious followers.

    No matter the small disagreements, at the end of the day you’re on the same team.

    The left tends to have more varied standards of what’s ok, and an unwillingness to compromise personal morals to fit in with the “team”.

    Most people think that’s a good thing. The opposite is how we keep ending up with fucking nazis all the time.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      OP wants to make 20 claims in one comment, and expects anyone that replies to address all 20 in depth.

      No, I mean that I wrote a comment with five sentences and you literally only read the first one.

      For the record, I wrote that sentence in reference to the post I linked to in the body. Take this chain, for example. Or this one where someone admitted point blank to not reading a single word I wrote.

      Now. It would be incredibly hypocritical of me to not respond to the rest of your comment after chewing you out for not responding to the rest of mine, so I will. I do not think it is unreasonable, if I agree with 90% of your positions but disagree with the remaining 10%, to expect not to be treated like a fully fledged enemy. I absolutely do not think that saying I’m on the same team should be sufficient to demand respect, but I do expect to be given the benefit of the doubt, and to be able have a civil discussion about why the less-drastic methods I prefer to achieve the same aims you seek are insufficient. I was not in the thread I think you are referencing.

      • GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Can I offer a little advice…? I recently started doing this myself.

        If the language starts to become emotional, nope out asap. These people just want a fight, and you won’t get anything else out of them.

        At best they are emotionally immature and might grow out of it some day, at worst they are trolls trying to drain your energy so it can’t be used elsewhere.

    • daltotron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s known as a Gish Gallop. The point of it is to overrwhelm someone with so many false claims that they can’t respond to them all.

      I’m not really sure that a gish gallop can happen in a written medium. In this case, someone could very well just make an extremely long drawn out post that addresses all 20 points. It’s not like a live chat or a conversation where someone can talk over you, or actually just raise a bunch of new points that don’t make a lot of sense when bunched together.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        In this case, someone could very well just make an extremely long drawn out post that addresses all 20 points.

        And that would take a lot of time and effort…

        For no chance of it working, your time is just being wasted

        • daltotron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why comment in the first place with only a single point that has absolutely no chance of working, then?