@chronohart
@luca @PCOWandre @activitypubblueskybridge @fedidevs @fediversenews

Let’s be honest most people have no idea this bridge is going to exist. So, they can’t opt-in. If nobody opts-in, you won’t be able to search for them by their ActivityPub handles. The bridge isn’t useful. People on both sides who would like to reconnect with their friends won’t be able to. However, if you know you hate BS, you can add the bridge to your personal block list and it isn’t an issue for you.

  • Hartmut Neubauer@social.cologne
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    @HistoPol@mastodon.social @jamie@boothcomputing.social @chronohart@tech.lgbt @luca@sironi.tk @PCOWandre@jauntygoat.net @activitypubblueskybridge@venera.social @fedidevs@venera.social @fediversenews@venera.social @snarfed@indieweb.social @shiri@foggyminds.com Proposal 1:
    Yes, but the “like”, “share” and “answer” buttons are hidden or disabled for Babsi; furthermore Freddie’s fediverse address (“@freddiemiller@friendica.xyz”) is hidden so that it is not easy for Babsi to mention him. Perhaps it is even possible to prevent textwise selection and copying. But even if copy & paste would be possible, as @HistoPol@mastodon.social mentioned, no trail would be left. ->

    • Hartmut Neubauer@social.cologne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      @HistoPol@mastodon.social @jamie@boothcomputing.social @chronohart@tech.lgbt @luca@sironi.tk @PCOWandre@jauntygoat.net @activitypubblueskybridge@venera.social @fedidevs@venera.social @fediversenews@venera.social @snarfed@indieweb.social @shiri@foggyminds.com Maybe that there is still something to do for the development. For example, if Mary answers to a couple of users (and usually you see all their fediverse names in the head of the message), Babsi sees a copy of this message with only the @ names of the Bluesky users and those Fediverse users who have agreed to the Bridge, but without those who have not.

      • HistoPol (#HP)@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        @agrinova@social.cologne

        Sounds öike an excellent solution

        We need to beef up moderation!–We’re going to be inundated by people with a completely different (net) sozialization and #netiquette:

        https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/110664442749882273
        @jamie@boothcomputing.social @chronohart@tech.lgbt @luca@sironi.tk @PCOWandre@jauntygoat.net @activitypubblueskybridge@venera.social @fedidevs@venera.social @fediversenews@venera.social @shiri@foggyminds.com @snarfed.org@snarfed.org

    • Hartmut Neubauer@social.cologne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      @HistoPol@mastodon.social @jamie@boothcomputing.social @chronohart@tech.lgbt @luca@sironi.tk @PCOWandre@jauntygoat.net @activitypubblueskybridge@venera.social @fedidevs@venera.social @fediversenews@venera.social @snarfed@indieweb.social @shiri@foggyminds.com 2nd possibility: to hide Freddie’s posts to Babsi. Okay, in this case not the whole discussion would be visible. But this might be done if Freddie has actively contradicted to the Bridge.
      3rd: to display and allow all. But this might be difficult and a contradiction to that what Freddie has agreed to.