• idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That study suggests salt is a settled issue and claims the only financial interests are food companies trying to make salt more acceptable. I don’t think it’s very good evidence for your argument.

    Who would financially benefit from the salt recommendations being artificially low?

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Who would financially benefit from the salt recommendations being artificially low?

      That’s the issue I have. I think it can only be reputation and closely held beliefs

      And likewise for high salt, there’s not much benefit in that position

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, with an artificially inflated RDA for salt, food companies can use more salt in their products without being labeled “unhealthy.” Salt, as a flavor enhancer and food preservative that stimulates thirst, makes food taste better, last longer, and potentially increases drink sales, all of which are profitable for food manufacturers and sellers. Going further, the medical system benefits from salt levels that are too low or too high, but much more from high levels, as that involves a longer treatment plan.

        What do you mean by reputation and belief?