• LukeMedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not wearing a seatbelt can harm your passengers in an accident. Based on that alone it’s reasonable imo

    • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It could then be argued that it would only be required under the circumstances in which the lack of a seatbelt would create a situation where the safety of others is threatened, and those affected do not consent to the risk.

        • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I would say that such a law, when being written, should maintain the original mindset as described in this comment of mine. What I mean by this is to say “whenever you are driving” does not cover the situations in which there would never be (or, at least, extremely unlikely to be) any harm to another except yourself, or those consenting. An example of this woud be offroading – perhaps you were implying for such laws to only apply when driving on public roads, but this wasn’t specified explicitly, so I’m making assumptions.

          • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, you are correct in both statements. I was not thinking of the more fringe scenarios, I meant specifically public roads.

            • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was not thinking of the more fringe scenarios

              Unfortunately, the contention around many laws lies within the gray rather than the black, and white.

              • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You are correct, though I am not a lawyer nor a lawmaker. I’m a guy on the Internet with opinions, and I don’t always immediately think of gray areas.